I found some about her economic policies, yet not much contributions on economy was mentioned. School project, please help.
2006-12-21 20:49:28 · 17 answers · asked by Fallen&Broken 5 in Social Science ➔ Economics
Neo-Liberalsim, and things a lot of countries hate because it makes the talented risk taker, greedy richer, but it helps all become better off. Maggy, mad the Union mad be forcing open shop in some industries, but it may of saved thier jobs.
2006-12-21 21:14:35 · answer #1 · answered by ram456456 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
None. Britain is an open economy with floating exchange rates. In this situation, fiscal policy (to which prime minister contributes) only determines the direction of international capital flows. Domestic economy in this set of circumstances only responds to monetary policy, which is set by the Bank of England. So whatever happens to modern British economy on a macro level is mainly due to the Bank of England; prime ministers are by and large irrelevant.
Read up on the Mundell-Fleming model:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1999/press.html
__________
2006-12-22 06:33:03 · answer #2 · answered by NC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the single incorrect element that the lady did incorrect for my section replaced into utilizing iron hand on the northern eire deadlock; a useless ringer for Goerge bush is doing nowin Afghanistan and Iraq. Adams and McGuiness at the on the spot are interior the political fold and violence is a element of the previous in eire now; because of her successor who pulled the "terrorists" decrease back into the political procedure. 2 issues extra about her death: a million. The conservatives panicked for that reason of the polltax riots( we now pay a good larger selection called council tax. 2.The Westland helicopter affair that pitched her antagonistic to that pitched her antagonistic to a very ambitious fellow conservative, michael heseltine. Geoffrey Howe besides the indisputable fact that utilized the deadly blow. to the relief of all Rastafarians in Brixton who Mrs Thatcher relentlessly pursued with the help of organising the notorious toddler help company. in my opinion as a black man or woman call me a traitor for liking Mrs T and Norman Tebbit, i learnt plenty politically from the conservative yet i dont accept as true with all their regulations.
2016-12-01 02:03:49 · answer #3 · answered by lemanski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of her fans would probably say standing up to the Unions, which changed the strike culture in the UK (which was very bad for the economy because much less work got done).
2006-12-21 21:03:40 · answer #4 · answered by carokokos 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Getting rid of the Unions and not backing down to Europe
And selling Eggs in her Dads shop
2006-12-21 20:54:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She wanted economic freedom without political freedom. Crippling interest rates, mass repsossions, huge suicide numbers = stagnant markets!
Had to go and pick a fight with Argentina so no one would notice.
Shut down all British Industry and basically helped the rich get very rich and the rest of us got poorer! See all the things around us that make this country rubbish... that is her legacy!
2006-12-22 01:49:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Poll Tax! Also making parents pay for milk at school for their kids aged 5 and over
2006-12-21 20:56:57 · answer #7 · answered by YeahYeahYeah 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Standing up to the unions, and her stance in Europe. One tough bird.
2006-12-21 21:07:21 · answer #8 · answered by Dr Sixpack 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel she stood up and made herself be heard when most men in that country felt that a woman should be seen and not heard.
2006-12-21 20:58:54 · answer #9 · answered by schneider2294@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Crushing the unions, or we would all be on the dole now
2006-12-21 21:01:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋