we (america) donate food to poverty stricken countries and their government takes it,then we donate more..if that be the case,why don't we either kick their azz or stop sending it?
2006-12-21 16:49:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Our aims may fall short of your expectations, but it needs doing. I defy you to show me one starving person in america and I will go feed them. Quit repeating drivel and look around you. People are buying cigarettes with food stamps. Or selling them for a discount at the track to have money to bet. Where are these masses of starving people?
2006-12-21 17:28:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont think its any of our bussiness, quite frankly. When we have people in our own country STARVING and being beaten up and having a terrible life why go in other country where they dont want us putting our noise where it doesnt belong? America would be a such stronger, better and more independent country. Some countries like Africa and India need more food but also need a different place to live.
Although the goverment is trying.
2006-12-22 01:00:15 · answer #2 · answered by Je vous aime. ♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwhy should we provide for others when we have needy here! Our leaders need their azzes as you put it kicked out of office for not taking care of the home front before supplying the rest of the world
2006-12-22 00:59:52 · answer #3 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The pupose of the program is to give taxpayer dollars to agribusiness. Once it's sold no one cares what happens to it.
2006-12-22 01:25:21 · answer #4 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not about governemnt. The people you see on tv that are our "leaders" are mere puppets. I encourage you to look up infowars.com
2006-12-22 00:57:35 · answer #5 · answered by Sam o 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋