I'm not meaning war, but who can survive on it's own without any aid but themselves.
I think west, not because I live on that side. But in San Francisco has the largest Federal Reserve Bank in the world, in California we have enough farmland to feed the whole west for a year and even the whole US. We also have Hawaii which has Pearl Harbor. And we got Alaska, which has plenty of oil.
Easts advantage is, they have factories which makes the weapons, some oil in Gulf of Mexico, and Washington DC. Other than that, I don't know anything else.
What do you think?
2006-12-21 15:25:42 · 9 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Oh yea and this is the USA
2006-12-21 15:27:54 · update #1
T-Dub, I'm saying 'IF'
2006-12-21 15:32:22 · update #2
First I live on the west coast
The west and east coast are a bunch of pusssy's and they are full of themselves. The central part of the united states is were the power lies.
2006-12-21 16:05:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets assume California takes the leadership based on population.
The west would lose badly.
Alaskan oil wouldn't help because the Cal's wouldn't let you drill for it.
Hawaii is a burden(logistics to support the population) and other than good vacationing and naval position(this is its greatest asset) it brings little to the table.
The western states although extremely rich in natural resources can not be mined, farmed, or even industrialized without the easterners or some other foreign country of which the Canadians would not help you because the New England's would than have another (hopefully more successful this time around-3ed times a charm) chance at conquering their neighbors to the north. Eastern sea power would soon blockade you and you could make Allies with the Mexicans. However, i Don't you think that best since the east wouldn't have to send Mexico city a Zimmerman telly to excite their desire for the reconquest of old Mexico (as far north as Utar if memory serves me). Oh that reminds me the Mormons will want sovereignty over Utar once more and if you say no the Mexicans might say "See"-oh an alliance against Caly. But even if I'm wrong about everything else Californian leadership would destroy any chance of Western success from the on set. Its like the Sun it rises in the East and sets in the west.
2006-12-21 16:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by sean e 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that the East would win b/c they have the Great Lakes (or at least some), and they get the Gulf, which has oil and seafood.
And how would Pearl Harbor help? I believe it is just a tourist attraction now?
2006-12-21 15:30:48 · answer #3 · answered by T-Dub 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The West, because they have the money to buy tons of weapons! And they have Hollywood special effects guys to blow up the East's oil supply.
2006-12-21 15:35:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
East Coast without question, we have the most resources and history, plus wihtout california the west coast is no man's land
2006-12-21 20:02:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The East coast would simply beat down the West coast and take all their supplies. It's a no brainer.
2006-12-21 15:29:06 · answer #6 · answered by nomorecash702 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Arnold will raise an army of super-robots and squash the resistance as he leads his people to glory!
2006-12-21 15:29:33 · answer #7 · answered by dane 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
East & West, This land is your land, this land is my land
from California
This land was made for you and me.
2006-12-21 15:40:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Whoever Texas sided with would win.
2006-12-21 16:40:33 · answer #9 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋