If enough of the right people with the right money who really cared about Americas Safety would get behind it this is possible. At this point I could support a solid Libertarian who would support a "Final Solution" against Terrorists in the Middle East.
Would support our Ally Israel to whatever extent it takes.
Would end Americas affiliation with the United Nations.
Would support a flat tax.
2006-12-21 15:14:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm serious about it. i do not consider both party thoroughly. It frustrates me that we do not have a nil.33 option. i imagine that if there became a possibly a average or something alongside those traces that had some effortless products. determination to key themes a million) Immigration 2) restore Social protection 3) end the conflict 4) Anti terrorism that made experience 5) give up policing the international 6) make investments in our united states of america 7) supply each and every man or woman a chance at a school degree 8) remedy our social themes 9) restore the border 10) remedy the flexibility shortage 11) end the freaking lobbyists 12) no more desirable particular interest 13) hit upon a ability option 14) restore the growing to be HMO complications 15) BAN express Lyrics in music-ok possibly not conceivable regardless of the indisputable fact that it will be effective! 16) Make the U. S. aggressive interior the international economic device 17) supply incentives to US depending businesses that manufacture products right here as a change of China 18) confirm out who's right here unlawful and in the journey that they have got a reason to conceal and performance questionable loyalties. 19) rigidity the UN to get off their asses 20) remedy the occupation criminal problem very few concepts I basically imagine the Republicans live in delusion Island and the Democrats have a nasty tendency to be fearful of creating the complicated judgements. except Clinton did a exceptionally solid pastime. basically desire their became more desirable determination and under no circumstances a lot freaking applicants toting the party traces.
2016-10-16 21:07:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by hafner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think a third or even a fourth viable party would be good. I think that parties would have to build a consensus that would more approximate the middle of the road on most issues. With the current system and only two parties, the extreme partisans often decide major issues.
2006-12-21 15:20:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by DavidNH 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Reaganite Party.
2006-12-21 16:45:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by ☠Skull Cleaner☠ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Libertarians are just Republicans that want to smoke pot and watch porn.
I voted for Nader twice. I don't think any rational being can disagree with anything he says.
2006-12-21 17:09:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by bettysdad 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree, I wish they brought back Ross Perot. He had a lot of popularity votes in the 96 election.
2006-12-21 15:18:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
without campaign finance reform it will not be possible and both sides know this so it is unlikely to happen. Its expected 1 billion dollars to win the white house in 08
2006-12-21 15:15:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blaise_Pascal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe if the average American had some political intelligence.
unfortunately you have too many straight ticket idiots that vote for one party out of habit.
Personally it would be better if we abolished political parties and let candidates run on the issues.
2006-12-21 15:11:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it is time to restore the consitution and the ideals which made America great, I am a Libertarian
2006-12-21 17:09:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-12-21 15:09:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by michael 1
·
0⤊
0⤋