Does the "test of love"...?

Question

mean going through some perseverence of personal heartache with that person?

Answer 1

yes it can mean that, all love can be hard sometimes,the key is that you get through the heartache. Love can be painful if you let it.

Answer 2

I think that perseverance in the face of heartache is what draws us closer and makes love sweeter. It could be viewed as a test, or simply seen as mutual personal growth. From my experience, the tests of love are the seemingly minor things that can cause so many problems in everyday life if they are not communicated and concluded satisfactorily. The 'tests' are the headaches... not the heartaches. When you love someone, sometimes the emotional stuff is just a given... after all... that's love, right?

Answer 3

It depends on the heartache. Is it caused by an outside influence like a separation (military, for example), or is it heartache caused by someone's behavior like cheating or drug abuse? If it's that, then I don't think that is part of a test of love, it's being co-dependent.

Answer 4

That's a loaded question, which raises more questions in my head. That could be a bonding situation if you ride the storm together without turning against one another. Sometimes one is stronger than the other and has to help the weaker one ride it out. If you are truly committed it will not seem like such a chore, but if you are "iffy" about the other person it can divide you.

Answer 5

One of the reasons i haven't fallen in love yet.
I'm scared that someone might just endup hurting me..I've seen enough heartache in the life of my friends ....i agree completly with what you are saying. and i also agree with what lalyn is saying...Love is painful when you let it be..

Answer 6

Yes it does,it also requires you to still want that person after all of that. Not an easy feat sometimes.

Answer 7

Yes.....I believe that's exactly it...and it can take on an endless amount of different forms....because it's love. And love feels just like pain sometimes...

Answer 8

magnificent question. Leah is in part terrific suited and on the terrific suited music however the bigger subject arises while in straightforward terms one verify is a service. In that situation a field attempt will by no skill paintings and the breeder has basically executed extra to wreck their breed via passing on a mutation 50% of the time without possibility of detecting it. this is somewhat actual of time-honored sires who're used very oftentimes and/ or via use of guy-made insemination the place their genes are disseminated in an rather intense frequency between something of the inhabitants. "field" sorting out is likewise now and lower back stated as "attempt" matings. this is an rather detrimental and unacceptable approach for figuring out inherited problems even in the previous there have been any DNA tests obtainable. Breeders will by no skill do away with inherited illnesses with attempt matings for the undemanding reason that there are such various mutations and... you could no longer constantly perceive persons that are vendors. additionally, if a service to service attempt mating happens then the possibility of producing an affected animal is 25% so the possibility nonetheless exists that an affected is basically no longer made from each and every mating, to no longer point out via that ingredient this is too previous due... so why blindly mate without understanding despite if a mutation exists with the opportunity of propagating extra of a similar subject? this could nicely be a silly mindset particularly now while there are such various DNA tests and well-being displays obtainable. the subject isn't in straightforward terms with the situation "what if the two mom and dad are vendors of a recessive disease" yet extra so "what if in straightforward terms one verify is a service." this is while the subject keeps to pass undetected.

Answer 9

That's a very small but important part of it.