English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-21 13:42:16 · 21 answers · asked by Derek W 1 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

21 answers

Well, he should finish in Iraq first !!!

2006-12-21 13:44:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to be honest they should bomb Iraq, they should just fly through the country a couple of times dropping lots of flyers saying get out and then bomb the hell out of it. It would save us many casualties, and the "innocent" people that were still there that got blown up were given fair warning. But instead bush wants to spend billions of dollars to put more troops in Iraq, one of these days when Bush sends all of our troops to Iraq and leaves us undefended terrorists are gonna invade us and we'll all be screwed because bush was an idiot and kept feeding troops to Iraq, Im beginning to wonder if thats the terrorists real plan, stay hidden in Iraq and keep getting Bush to send troops over, then in america, there are terrorists that are arming themselves and will start a war on american soil.

2006-12-21 21:49:10 · answer #2 · answered by somerandomguy 2 · 0 0

No.

Might I suggest that you open yourself up to more than one side of the stories being reported by the media?

Further, might I suggest that you wake up and realize that there are people just like you who live in Iran that would suffer if the cowboy in office currently went further in his war-mongering to kill more innocents?

2006-12-21 21:46:04 · answer #3 · answered by somewherein72 4 · 0 0

I think Bush will bomb whoever the hell he pleases, and for no good reason.

2006-12-21 21:45:16 · answer #4 · answered by theophilus 5 · 0 0

There should be no unilateral actions against any country. The Iranian people are speaking out against their president for his recent statements and are not going to stand by idly while Ahmadinejad does his best Hitler impersonation.

2006-12-21 21:46:04 · answer #5 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 0

Nope

2006-12-21 21:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutelty yes. I say lets send over 2000 sorties fully loaded with bunker busters, and tactical nukes. End of problem.

2006-12-21 21:45:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

no because there are people there that didn't do anything to us and they are getting killed. you wouldn't like it if Iraq bombed us. and anyway my parents don't like bush( like many other african americans)

2006-12-21 21:46:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No because that would mean another deployment for my husband and all our troops. They deserve a brake

2006-12-21 21:44:21 · answer #9 · answered by Charisma 6 · 2 0

I think he should bomb himself!

2006-12-21 21:48:03 · answer #10 · answered by Me 6 · 0 1

i wish it was that easy...lots of innocent women & children under that bomb you speak of !! no !

2006-12-21 21:45:46 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers