Ah... divide 3 + 2x by x... then divide 4x - 1 by x...
Now you have 3/x + 2 on the top of the fraction or dividing line...
On the bottom of the fraction or dividing line you have 4 - 1/x..
Anything divided by something going toward infinity goes toward 0....( 1 divided by 100 is one hundredth... 1 divided by 1000 is one thousandth... & so on)
So you end up w/ 0 + 2 divided by 4 - 0...
Which is 2 divided by 4...
This is quite formulaic... it is something that students tend to learn off & then act as if it is 'obvious'... as nonstandard analysis shows it is by no means 'obvious' that the way we do calculus is the right way...
& for future reference, it really does make things easier on yourself & others if you use brackets...
limit (3 + 2x) / (4x - 1), where lim gets nfinitely large..
2006-12-21 13:30:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by K V 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is the limit as x--> ∞ of (3 + 2x)/(4x + 1), right? The answer to that question actually is 1/2. The way you look at it is that when x approaches ∞, the +3 on top and +1 on bottom are going to become negligible (adding a 3 doesn't make a difference when we're talking about ∞). Thus, it's really the limit as x --> ∞ of 2x/4x. Now you can cancel out the x's, and you get 2/4. Thus, the limit as x-->∞ is 2/4, or 1/2.
2006-12-21 13:31:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sephisabin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
When solving limit questions where x approaches infinity we look at the most dominant terms:
In this qn the 2x/4x is the most dominant. The 3 and the -1 will become insignificant as x approaches infinity
hence
limit 3 +2x/4x - 1
x → ∞
= limit 2x/4x
x → ∞
= limit 2/4
x → ∞
= 2/4 = 1/2
2006-12-21 13:39:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by anonymous 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
To find the limit as x approaches infinity you must divide each term by the x value raise to the highest power in the denomanator. so...
limx>infinity = 3 +2x/4x - 1
limx>infinity = (3/x +2x/x)/(4x/x - 1/x)
As x approaches infinity -1/x and 3/x approach 0 and so you get
limx>infinity = (0 +2)/(4 - 0)
limx>infinity = (2)/(4) = 1/2
2006-12-21 14:12:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
limit (3 +2x)/(4x - 1)
x → ∞
= limit (3/x +2)/(4 - 1/x)
x → ∞
=2/4
=1/2
2006-12-21 13:27:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by sahsjing 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is the expression (3+2x)/(4x-1) ?
If it is, you can see by inspection that the constants (3 in the numerator and -1 in the denominator) won't contribute much to the answer as x gets really huge.
2006-12-21 13:28:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by xaviar_onasis 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
take x common in the numerator and denominator
(3/x + 2)/ (4 - 1/x)
taking limit (1/x) term be zero
= 2/4
= 1/2
2006-12-21 13:41:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kinu Sharma 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The series a million/n does certainly converge to 0 as n procedures infinity. it particularly is the series of __partial sums__ of this series which diverges. i.e. the series of sums a million a million+ a million/2 a million +a million/2 + a million/3 a million + a million/2 + a million/3 + a million/4 ... ... ... keeps on transforming into for ever with none decrease. on the same time as the guy words of this series do strategies-set 0, their sum will at last exceed any quantity you care to call. wish this helps make sparkling issues.
2016-12-15 05:53:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
divide the nr and dr by x
lim x> inf (3/x)+2/4-(1/x)
as x tends to infinity 1/x will tend to zero
so the limit=2/4=1/2
2006-12-21 13:26:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by raj 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Go to this website for answer.
http://www.mathnerds.com/mathnerds/links/links.aspx
2006-12-21 13:34:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by childofGod 4
·
0⤊
0⤋