He may be able to reach a bigger cross section of voters that way.
2006-12-21 13:16:20 · 10 answers · asked by pelone 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, then they could do hilarious racist jokes.
2006-12-21 14:20:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think a Kucinich/Obama would be the ticket.
Neither are members of the Washington elite. Neither seem to have much obvious baggage like Clinton.
Kucinich was opposed to the war from the beginning and has called for all funding appropriated to the Iraq war be diverted to an immediate withdrawal.
Check his site out.
Good sense politics in the White House
And the most beautiful First Lady since Jackie Kennedy is a bonus too.
Obama gets the experience to run after Kucinich leaves office
Clinton stays on and does outstanding job as eventual speaker of the house or first woman VP under Obama
2006-12-22 21:50:03 · answer #2 · answered by Jack C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will probably choose someone that can help him carry a larger spectrum of voters. Possibly a person with more of a Hispanic or Native American origin to sweep up more votes and ensure victory in the election. Good Question.
2006-12-21 13:25:42 · answer #3 · answered by jameskidd2009 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is this a joke?
First, Michael Richards has no political experience, so he wouldn't get elected because of that.
Second, his recent outburst would make it so the majority of Americans would not vote for him, and I doubt a black man would want him as his running mate.
2006-12-21 13:26:35 · answer #4 · answered by greencoke 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That will be scary. Here's a scarier one, what if he gets stuck with Hilary Clinton for a running mate?
Sorry all, but I am hoping for Rudy Giuliani (sp?)
2006-12-21 13:20:19 · answer #5 · answered by FireBug 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
a million. Moore would not hate usa, he hates specific those that make a mockery of our large usa and this is ideals (you know those - spouting nationalist rhetoric on one hand, then ignoring the rule of regulation and labeling loose speech as 'treason' on the different). 2. Moore would not look like Obama's sort. too lots anger and partisanship, no longer adequate wish and consensus making. 3. There are already various good selections obtainable. invoice Richardson and Jim Webb are evoked as 2 short-checklist opportunities.
2016-11-28 03:04:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh why hell yes. Mel Gibson for ambassador to Israel, Samuel L. Jackson for ambassador to Germany. Wow, that would be a good administration.
2006-12-21 13:19:55 · answer #7 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He should, it would highlight the Democrat's platform lie of "tolerance."
2006-12-21 14:10:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He should choose me!
2006-12-21 13:22:47 · answer #9 · answered by Big Fat Idiot 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
or david duke ha ha, I don't think it works that way
2006-12-21 13:20:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋