Think about it. America is pretty much divided 50/50. If there was one Democrat and one Republican each serving as president at the same time, wouldn't more issues be resolved through negotiations instead of years of arguing who is really right?
2006-12-21 11:52:16 · 15 answers · asked by P W 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
On the contrary, there would be years of arguing and little negotiation. Both parties are so polarized right now there would never be a consensus between a left and right President. The best scenario is the one we are seeing now, one party controlling the Congress and one controlling the Executive. IN this case, it would be nice if the Executive branch had far, far, far different leadership.
2006-12-21 11:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, the separation of powers is a complex and fragile puzzle... a work of art really.
Adding a second Executive would throw everything out of wack. Are they co-equals, or is their authority split amongst different spheres and departments? Either way, I think that this would be like the proconsuls of the Roman Empire and not work.
I think the divisions in American ideology are largely driven from the top-down. I don't think most people feel the hate and anger for eachother that the media would have us believe.
2006-12-21 12:04:45 · answer #2 · answered by Mark P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aside from Slavery, that was one reason why America had a civil war, and everyone knows what happened to the Confederates!
2006-12-21 11:55:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about,,, ask the president of Mexico that think he's also the president of the USA. He's intermingle in our politics, just because he have more than 12+ millions of his citizen here illegally... why??
2006-12-21 11:57:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
criminal duty, in basic terms how lots of yankee companies are definitely owned through individuals and what % of the paintings tension are definitely individuals. i think of specific incentives ought to get carry of to companies that are definitely American. and that i think of extra beneficial barriers and price lists would desire to be imposed on those that are no longer. reliable rules are necessary for the two companies and the heads of businesses. some CEOs decide on their hand slapped, some decide on intense reformatory time and a few decide on the dying penalty.
2016-12-15 05:49:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a compound fracture. Look. Do this, give the south it's confederacy and make it two countries and this way everybody is ahead.
2006-12-21 11:59:44 · answer #6 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe America should adopt the British parliamentary system. It certainly represents the nation better.
2006-12-21 11:56:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A president with one brain would be enough.
2006-12-21 11:57:40 · answer #8 · answered by James T 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, there would just be arguing. There is no perfect government. And all governments colapse cyclicly, I believe.
2006-12-21 12:07:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is why we have two houses of Congress.
2006-12-21 11:55:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋