English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

•The October 1984 bombing in Brighton, England, by the PIRA in an unsuccessful but lethal attempt to kill then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

•The June 1985 bombing of Air India Flight 182 originating from Canada

•The destruction of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988

•The killing of Nicaraguan civilians by the United States during the 1980s.

•The 1993 World Trade Center bombing

•The 1993 Mumbai bombings

•The 1995 sarin gas attacks in Tokyo, Japan

•The Oklahoma City bombing by Timothy McVeigh on April 19, 1995

•The Centennial Olympic Park bombing in 1996

•The US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania on August 7, 1998

•The Omagh bombing in Northern Ireland (August 15, 1998)

•The August 31 – September 22: Russian Apartment Bombings kills about 300 people, leading Russia into Second Chechen War

•The September 11, 2001 attacks in New York, and Washington D.C.[32] [33]

•The 2001 Indian Parliament attack on December 13, 2001

•The Passover Massacre on March 27, 2002 in Netanya, Israel

•The Moscow theatre siege and the Beslan school siege in Russia

•The Bali bombing in October 2002

•The March 11, 2004 attacks in Madrid

•The July 7, 2005 bombings in London

•The second Bali bombing on October 1, 2005

•The Mumbai train bombings on 11 July 2006.

2006-12-21 11:27:35 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Some terrorist attacks around the world. If you dont mind getting blown up just bring the troops home.

2006-12-21 11:35:04 · update #1

15 answers

I'm sorry, what was the reason we are in Iraq? Nothing you mentioned above has ANYTHING to do with Iraq.

2006-12-21 11:30:29 · answer #1 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 6 0

To take a qoute from a hilarious movie...."erroneous, erroneous on both accounts" or in this case all accounts. So what your saying is we should be the savior of every country ever done wrong by Iraq... or for that matter done wrong by anyone. We're not the world police, and we shouldnt be trying to be. We're like the new generations Roman Empire. Trying to conquer the world in our own sense. And it's ridiculous. Ok, maybe an initial attack on afganistan for the attacks of 9/11. I'm not some super hippie tree hugging no war. War is neccassary sometimes, especially when our home country is threatened. But to carry on into Iraq, was a mistake. ANd mind you I'm a military member serving in Germany currently, and a republican at that. Iraq is turning into this generations Vietnam, gorilla warfare against deeply hidden insurgents.... yeah we find some every day or two but we keep losing troops for what? So that Iraq could set up a democracy, that half their people don't even want. Iraq is one of the worst decisions in the history of the US military efforts... bottom line

2006-12-21 11:45:16 · answer #2 · answered by Wsdm 2 · 3 0

None of the things you have listed have a DAMN THING do do with Iraq They are acts of terrorist cells There is absolutely nothing that proves these terrorist cells originated in Iraq Oklahoma City was done from someone from the U.S. How in the hell is this tied to Iraq???In fact not a 1 of the things you listed can be traced back to Iraq At least get your facts Right. We are in Iraq because Bush put out rumors that Iraq had W.M.D.s which has prov-en to be untrue. There were NO terrorist organizations that were active in Iraq until after the U.S. invasion. THINK ABOUT THAT!

2006-12-21 11:45:17 · answer #3 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 4 0

You forgot to add your date of Birth to the list.

You are thinking with your heart when linking the listed events with Iraq. Keep it this way because if you start thinking with your head, you may come up with some evil plans.
It is good that the Democrates don't see the link as you and others like you see it.

2006-12-21 11:57:17 · answer #4 · answered by Ottawan-Canada 3 · 2 0

... is that why Bush said Iraq had nothing to do with terror when we first invaded?

those would be much more valid reasons to go after Osama... Palestine groups or even Iran, Saudis or Pakistan... than it would be to go into Iraq... since all of those nations have MUCH greater links than Iraq did to the vast majority of those attacks...

nice job of cut and paste there... read the 9-11 report please... and thanks for proving yet again that there are still some conservatives that don't really have a clue about terrorism, who is doing it and the sources of terrorism...

2006-12-21 11:33:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

How can you balme one party, now the majority party? It was a mistake according to 76 % of the American public

2006-12-21 11:34:40 · answer #6 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 3 0

Why don't you wake up to the 21st century and get your head out of your butt. Your lacking oxygen and your brain is starving. You probably couldn't find your butt with both hands anyway.

2006-12-21 12:15:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Iraq was not involved in ONE thing on your list.....It is sad, that we have allowed a misguided paraniod right wing group of people to lead us to hell.

2006-12-21 12:05:28 · answer #8 · answered by rubiconski 2 · 4 0

What's your point? I didn't see you mention one thing about Iraq. Our President isn't fighting terrorism, he's creating more hatred and more terrorists.

2006-12-21 11:42:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

you should combine all the deaths in these attacks and compare them to the number of Iraqi citizens that have died in the last three and a half years because of U.S. attacks. i haven't done it myself, but I would bet that the second number is higher.

2006-12-21 11:31:47 · answer #10 · answered by Critical Mass 4 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers