make three different shows but with same rosters.
2006-12-21 11:27:14 · 15 answers · asked by Yandel A 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
yes they should all merge together then sink to the fiery depths of hell
2006-12-21 11:29:31 · answer #1 · answered by kelly r 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you merge three shows with the same people, more frequent injuries are bound to happen. These wrestlers are already doing three shows a week usually(a televised show and two house shows), and fatigue can be seen throughout the rosters. If you saw the Hardys on RAW, they were all torn up from the night before's ladder match, in no shape to compete. Besides, there's far too many mid-card wrestlers, and not enough main eventers, like there was when RAW and SD were combined before.
2006-12-21 11:52:49 · answer #2 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see all of them merging anytime soon. RAW, Smackdown, & ECW was three seperate brands of the WWE & they should remain seperate. Although be expecting ECW to team up with Smackdown for some live shows & TV Tapings starting December 26th.
2006-12-21 11:35:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think that they should merge all three shows together and have one night per week of raw, ecw, and smackdown on for 5 hours.
2006-12-21 11:58:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The merge woiuld be a good element. it quite is obvious that the ECW of previous is long gone. The ECW roster is so vulnerable on expertise that with the intention to maintain it they are going to ought to merge the ECW & SD rosters some. such through fact the Kane/BDV showdown. the only one on the ECW roster even close enogh in length to make beating BDV beleivable is Thorn and that may not going to take place. So yet another monster is provided in. This time it quite is Kane. they are going to fued for a at the same time as and probaly be capped off at SS.
2016-10-15 09:55:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea but only merge raw and smackdown together ecw is cool on it's own.
2006-12-21 14:47:14 · answer #6 · answered by Aj super sexy!!! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reason there is 3 seperate brands, as opposed to one big roster, is that it gives the WWE an opportunity to give new talent a chance to be seen. if there was one roster and 2-3 shows a week, you would only see the top guys, especially Triple H, on tv. Thanks to the 3 brands, we now have guys like Mike Knox, Brian Kendrick and Kenny No-Last-Name. so to answer your question, it would be a very bad Idea for the 3 brands to merge.
2006-12-21 12:50:35 · answer #7 · answered by jacksonville_scorpio32244 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're already one show. The Hardyz are on both, ECW come to both, Smackdown guys come to RAW etc etc. They just put them under different labels. (all of which are own by Vince)
2006-12-21 14:01:47 · answer #8 · answered by Ash 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Raw & Smackdown should because they are wwe shows. but not ecw because even though the wwe sponsers them they are not part of the wwe
2006-12-25 00:41:36 · answer #9 · answered by KISS Fan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are already merged together - what corporation owns all three? Oh yeah the Mac Mahon corporation.
2006-12-21 11:31:11 · answer #10 · answered by happy_southernlady 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋