2006-12-21 11:12:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
yes...she is all that and a bag of chips.
2006-12-21 11:14:23 · answer #1 · answered by Doctor J. 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no way man.....dressing up with those kind of clothes as if she doesn't have enough money 2 be real nice ones is not Fergalicious.........is called Cheap
2006-12-21 12:17:33 · answer #2 · answered by sweet babe 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yea, I think she's Fergalicious!!! Why not?! I'm Emilicious!!!! Any questions?! haha....
2006-12-21 11:39:38 · answer #3 · answered by Emiliana 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think she's that amazing...not in terms of physique or in song writing ability...that london bridge song made no sense, since london bridge doesn't actually go up and down - major lyrical error me thinks...
but there ya go, who's to say i'm not just jealous cause i don't get a "-licious" on the end of my name?!
2006-12-21 11:16:58 · answer #4 · answered by sky_blue 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nup - I don't understand the fuss. More flesh showing does NOT mean more sexy. It just means cheap.
2006-12-21 11:15:15 · answer #5 · answered by FoxyB 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hey the songs good and fergies other big hit is good, london bridge
2006-12-21 11:18:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She just likes to think that so lets not ruin her confidence and tell her that she's not!
2006-12-21 11:15:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thinka she looka lika man!
2006-12-21 15:42:52 · answer #8 · answered by homesick_in_va 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eh, she's hot right now, but she ain't all that licious, ferga or otherwise.
2006-12-21 11:20:07 · answer #9 · answered by ♫ giD∑■η ♫ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She's cool. I like her music and she seems to be alright.
2006-12-21 11:41:16 · answer #10 · answered by mirmade13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
deffinetly not.
any grown woman who pee's their own pants or has a "sweaty crotch" should not be discribed as that.
2006-12-21 11:22:40 · answer #11 · answered by almostgonefornow 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋