Hilary, Obama, Edwards, or Gore???

Answer 1

I think it all depends on what you want from a President.

Personally, I am not a fan of Hillary Clinton. She is the senator of my state, and she hasn't done anything for the Upstate part that has affected my life. In fact, she's screwed up some of my school systems because she allowed for any child to be able to take an AP class, which made the classes less advanced.

I am not sure how I feel about Edwards, I like him, but I disagree with a lot of his political theories. He supports the death penalty (which I am against) as well as affirmative action (I believe affirmative action should be awarded to you based on financial needs, not race).

I like Gore, but I think he's better when he's off the political platform. I think he would have laid down if he was in on September 11, 2001. By no means am I a fan of President Bush, but we didn't have great candidates that year. I think Gore is doing MORE now that he is away from politics.

I love Obama. What can I say? The guy isn't corrupted from where I stand, and he has this charisma about him that still says that he is humble. He's helped the poor with tax cuts, and he's made it so mammograms are covered by insurance companies in Illinois. He has met with groups in Palestine and other Middle Eastern countries and obviously knows what he is doing, and he traveled over Africa. Overall, I think he is bipartisan enough to get things accomplished and not to let his pride get in the way.

Answer 2

Obama is a man of Honor and Integrity. Barrack Obama is just what America needs right now and the reason why is because he is NOT a member of the "Skull & Bones" club like our current dumbell is.

Hilary Clinton doesn’’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader ““war”” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment, and there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the mess that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the ““War on Terrorism”” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be a stellar policy maker on the domestic front, but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy. Obama or Gore I believe can pull this off.

1 second ago - Report Abuse

Answer 3

Edwards, he is the only hope the Dems have to take the Pres. office. Not to take any thing away from the others, they all have their good and bad points, but the majority of America would not vote for the other three.

Answer 4

Obama is THE man! It's time for some fresh, young blood in the White House. Someone who is NOT in the "good ol' boys club".

Answer 5

I say Edwards with Obama for VP. Obama has plenty of time to run for Prez.

Answer 6

Hilary, it's about it time we had 1. a women in office and 2. a democrat.

Answer 7

I agree with Paul. I would say McCain although you didn't give him as a choice. McCain is a better Republican than Bush. He also has a solid military background. He will do a better job in Iraq than Bush.

Answer 8

Gore says he is not running but if he did he would get my vote.
This is his time especially considering the other candidates it would be a landslide.

Answer 9

That's like picking between Curly, Larry, Moe, and Shemp

Answer 10

McCain