Does "W" truely have what it takes to be Commander in Chief of the military and stand up for those charged with murder in a war he promotes? The charges against some who wasn't present, but in command. Where does the responsibility stop? George W. Bush wasn't there either. I rememeber a great man said " THE BUCK STOPS HERE!
2006-12-21 10:12:33 · 5 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh yea, a soldier can't let war get to them. Terrible how we set comfortable in America and say " how could you do such"? War is murder and now we decide to turn our heads and say "only some times".
2006-12-21 10:25:51 · update #1
Bush has no right, legal or otherwise, to get involved with the trail.
Responsibility?
Like Berger stealing & destroying documents that connected Clinton to 9/11?
Truman screwed up too. The weapons and big guns that killed over 50,000 Americans in Korea, were a gift to Russia from Truman.
(It's a little more complicated than that. Look it up.) THAT WAS ONE TIME THE BUCK DIDN'T STOP.
Cool question, since you knew that Bush couldn't legally get involved in a trial.
2006-12-21 10:24:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He absolutely has. That's why he has so many Liberals upset. "W" makes a decision, then sticks to it, regardless of what others think. I'd vote for him again up against any Democrat that seems to want to run this next time.
2006-12-21 10:21:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
More then you'll ever hope to have...oh was there a question here? Oh so now your in the military???
2006-12-21 10:18:55 · answer #3 · answered by WelshKiwi 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think you mean 'cojones' and frankly, murder is murder.
Leavenworth was around during WWII as well, and soldiers wound up there for crimes. I don't think they were 'stood up for' then.
2006-12-21 10:14:58 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You must be kidding!
2006-12-21 10:17:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋