Is this the biggest problem we have in America today: moral relativism?

Question

No longer is there right and wrong. There is now less and more wrong. If something is wrong, it is wrong period. I see so many liberals and liberal Republicans use this stupid argument all the time. I asked a question regarding whether the new MA governor was right for prohibiting the state police to arrest illegals. I got a few answers about the President's refusal to deal with the issue. So what, I know Pres Bush is wrong on the issue. Just because he is does not mean that whatever the MA governor did is acceptable.

Once again, is moral relativism the biggest problem we have today? No one wants to have standards anymore.

If this is not the biggest issue, what is? Save the political attacks for another question.

Here we go again. "Police need to be specially trained in immigration law." Really, how about you are here illegally and you are under arrest. Then have the INS pick them up. Training concluded.

Answer 1

The erosion of morals and ethics is at the core of all of our problems and it does not matter if your on the left or the right there is absolutely NO accountability from either side. There is now less and more wrong(what a great statement, you vote for the lesser of two evils, that is what our elections have become) Wrong is wrong, and people are responsible for their actions, ACCOUNTABILITY... there is no doubt in my mind that we are just a new version of the Romans.(and we all know what happened to them)

Answer 2

It's not a moral issue it's a legal one. Police need to be specially trained to enforce immigration law. That's how it works in other states, such as Florida, where some state cops can enforce it. If the governor determines that the state doesn't have the man power or that man power needs to be used elsewhere how is that a moral question? If the state had to add increase the number of state troopers to handle immigration cases is the federal government going to reimburse them? Again, immigration is the responsibility of the federal government. If there is a moral question here isn't why isn't the Federal government living up to it's responsibility?

Answer 3

ethical relativism is greater a contradiction in words than something. The term means that our morality is relative to that which we choose for to earnings it to, which might render it thoroughly ineffective. subsequently, we require a benchmark, or commonplace, it relatively is unchangeable. As a society, we've become adept at "changing issues around" to accommodate our own needed result. that may not a clean twist...it began interior the backyard of Eden. The Muslims are possibly the suitable option to criticize, yet they have their skeletons besides. the biggest ingredient of our society that reinforces ethical relativism is the shortcoming of a sturdy, unchangeable ethical code. Have we no longer considered a breakdown of the morals and values we used to stay via interior the previous 50 years? Why can we ought to do away with the ten Commandments (palms down the suitable ethical code)? Why will no longer be able to we pray in school? Why are infants having infants, and then flushing them down bogs? We, as a society, have become tolerant, or consistent with possibility numb, to the goings on around us. institutions like the ACLU have people so intimidated that we dare no longer say a word. everybody is far greater in touch approximately each and every ones rights than their household initiatives. we've become sufferers of the liberal ideas-set, and we are accepting it with no combat. I for one am embarrassed for us. Be nicely.

Answer 4

I don't think the problem is moral relativism itself, but the failure of the electorate to hold politicians accountable for their misdeeds. Some call America the United States of Amnesia.

Answer 5

Right is right and wrong is wrong, always. Maybe it's not so much that relativism abounds as it is that people are not being able to distinguish the two either through upbringing or just plain apathy.

Answer 6

I mean... to a degree, that's the flaw with freedom... everyone is free to believe what they want... and if that happens, some people are gong to believe some pretty crazy stuff...

but that's what the courts and to a lesser degree the congress are for... to decide what the community standards are and what they will bear...

it's far from a perfect system... but everyone has "standards"... they are just totally different standards... the melting pot burns people sometimes...