English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-21 09:43:33 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

i beg to differ, do you think if the eyes of the media were not on them they would have even got off their lazy arses to look for the killer!

2006-12-21 09:51:14 · update #1

7 answers

I think they're under huge amounts of pressure to get someone for this so they've probably arrested these two guys faster than they would have done.

My worry is that they .won't get a conviction because of this

2006-12-21 09:52:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clearly they do not have the right man, since obviously it was a woman. They have to do something to work off that paunch from eating all those darn donuts. If they didn't randomly arrest people, taxpayers would not feel like they are getting their money's worth.

2006-12-21 17:47:40 · answer #2 · answered by Wendi lu who 4 · 1 1

I would say that they have the right guy. They don't release the name of a suspect unless they are pretty darn sure.

2006-12-21 17:47:22 · answer #3 · answered by Jenni B 2 · 0 0

Reckon it's pretty much in the can.....which funnily enough is where he should be spending the rest of his natural.

2006-12-21 17:48:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dont know but i think they should have waited to make sure he was the murderer before they made his name public

2006-12-21 17:47:50 · answer #5 · answered by jinx 5 · 0 0

shut up

2006-12-21 17:45:46 · answer #6 · answered by missree 5 · 0 0

there not bloody stupid

2006-12-21 17:46:40 · answer #7 · answered by valda54 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers