Most of them suck because it never matches up to the first movie. When the first movie is made and it's great and makes a lot of money, the studio says "hey lets do a sequel and make more money" but some of the same actors don't come back or it's not written as well or not directed by the same guy and it just doesn't match up to the original.
Some exceptions are: Godfather II, Terminator 2
2006-12-21 06:22:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back is considered by many to be significantly better than the the Star Wars: A New Hope (the first one made).
Also, many prefer Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers over Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring.
In these cases, the second movie is at least on the same tier as the first -- if not better.
2006-12-21 06:23:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dean E 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is very difficult to write, but objectively (as far as critiquing films go), I must say that The Empire Strikes Back (aka Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire...) was a better movie overall than its predecessor (Star Wars, aka Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope). In terms of dialogue, acting, special effects, and score are concerned, it's a no-brainer. Granted, the original changed movie-making history - it was a revolution all on its own. TESB might be the best plot twist and cliff-hanger of the 20th century.
I also think the second installment of the Lord of the Rings (The Two Towers) was better than the first (Fellowship of the Ring).
And, Aliens was better than Alien, but neither was a truly great film.
2006-12-21 06:22:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by CPT Jack 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Spiderman 2, X-men 2, Casino Royale, Batman Returns, Resident Evil 2, The mummy 2...
2006-12-21 09:26:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Godfather Part Two
The Empire Strikes Back
2006-12-21 06:30:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
American pie 2 was better than the first and American wedding was even better. Also Next friday was good, I think it only suck when it's like a scary movie.
2006-12-21 06:27:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ms.Donna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does Harry Potter count? Also, I personally enjoyed the second Toy Story more than the first..other than that, the first movies are usually best and should stay the only one.
2006-12-21 06:18:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
now and back sequels may be greater suitable than the unique. Empire strikes back replaced into the suitable action picture star Wars ever, observed via a clean wish then Revenge of the Sith. The POTC and LOTR sequels are good I hate it whilst Disney make crap unimaginative sequels to classic cartoons. what's the ******* factor? will no longer be able to they spend their added time engaged on new innovations for clean movies? maximum horror sequels suck yet devil's Rejects replaced into greater suitable than residing house of one thousand Corpses. interior the comparable way Evil ineffective 2 replaced into greater suitable than the 1st action picture.
2016-10-15 09:29:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion Dawn of the Dead
was better than Night of the Living Dead.
Also Empire was better than A New Hope.
but most of the time the sequels do suck.
2006-12-21 06:37:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought the second Resident Evil movie was better than the first. I still thought the first one was good though.
2006-12-21 06:18:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jenn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋