3-6-1 ENGLAND's FORMATION... is it good?

Question

haha this sounds crazy but i think this is some kind of special formation... i mean 3-6-1!

3 defenders---> rio ferdinand, john terry, ashley cole
( coz any other defenders are not as good as them, 1 john terry is actually 2 defenders, he's just good)
substitute --gary neville

6 midfielders---> frank lampard, steven gerrard, joe cole, owen hargreaves, theo walcott ( he's sort of working magic with @ arsenal now) & aaron lennon
( loads of very good midfielders means the ball will get stuck in the middle no matter wad plus even if it does slide pass all 6 of them, there're the superb defenders)
substitute--michael carrick

1 striker----> wayne rooney
( all the other strikers are so crap u can't really imagine them playing & wasting space & time, crouch runs too slow, defoe too inaccurate, owen is just dead & rotten, then there're also alot of support form 6... 6 midfielders)
substitute-- peter peter crouch

make sense???
haha pls give me ur oppinions

Answer 1

The formation is not a bad idea but the biggest problem is the 3 defenders. Only 1 (Cole) of the 3 defenders are fast so if you play a team like the Netherlands with Rudd, Van persi and Robben..this players with there pace would completely destroy the defense because it would be 3 vs 3 when Netherlands attack (and there is no way J Terry and Rio could catch up with Persi and Robben) so every attack would either be a goal or red card for the defender (late tackle). So to answer your question NO>this would be a bad formation to play only if you opponent is playing 4-5-1

Answer 2

When is the last time England won something? There is your answer. 4-4-2 with a machine as a libero, then England will win.


Peace,

Answer 3

yeah but you forgot david beckham lol and also you forgot michael owen best striker yeah but other than that sounds good to me

Answer 4

The best i saw, but if Owen was there it would have been better, awsome though