English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1) The now famous Downing Street Memo, along with the testimony of former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neil constitute direct evidence of a decision by Bush to invade a sovereign foreign nation on entirely specious grounds.


2) The decision to deploy chemical weapons in Fallujah came from Rumsfeld who no doubt covered his *** by receiving assent from Bush to use these banned weapons


3) The decision by Bush to dig up dirt on UN diplomats when the General Assembly was considering his ill-fated war resolution


4) Authorizing torture of POW's - a direct violation of the protocols of the Geneva Convention

5) Holding so called "non-combatant civilians" for an indefinite period of time ,depriving them of their day in court ,acess to counsel, and acess to family members who could plead their cause to the public.

2006-12-21 04:33:44 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

6) Kidnapping so called "terror suspects" , placing them on Rendition Airways, and sending them to countries like Uzbekistan who boil these ,untried,unconvicted people alive.

7) foreknowledge of 9/11 by Bush, Rice, and the top Neocons at the Pentagon . The only ones warned were Fmr. SF. Mayor Willie Brown, Salman Rushdie (Via Scotland Yard) and Ariel Sharon, who cancelled his trip to NYC scheduled for the weekend prior to 9/11.

8) Engaging in a massive voter suppression campaign in the state of Ohio to secure a second term by fraudulent means. Such activities carry criminal sanctions as outlined in the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

9) Covering up the involvement of Mossad in 9/11. The fellow that secreted these spies and explosives experts out of country and back into Israel , Michael Chertoff, was promoted from Criminal Division of the Justice Dept to lead the Dept. of Homeland Security.!

10) The attempt to quash the testimony of Sibel Edmonds using the bogus shield of th

2006-12-21 04:34:14 · update #1

11) Engaging in a sytematic campaign of depriving political dissidents of their 1st ammendment rights to condem Bush administration policy. Protesters are removed out of crowds and summarily placed in jail. The Secret Service, under orders of the President, conduct "Harassment and intimidation Interviews" of anti -Bush political activists.

12) Conspiring with Ken Lay to rip-off the the people of California by creating false energy shortages,thus creating the causus belli for charging energy consumers illegal, confiscatory rates. 13) Conspiring to rig the vote count in the state of Fl. by hacking optical scan machines and E-voting machines and covering up the latter by passing legislation in the state of Fl to prevent post-election examination of E-voting machines.

14) Illegally transferring $700 million from the budget for the war in Afghanistan for war preparations in Iraq in July 2002, without Congressional Approval. This is a Constitutional violation.

2006-12-21 04:34:41 · update #2

15) The "outing" of CIA operative Valerie Plame.

2006-12-21 04:35:00 · update #3

10 answers

All of the above. Go to thomas.loc.gov and search for Cynthia McKinney's bill. She's started the impeachment process already :)

2006-12-21 04:39:30 · answer #1 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1 2

Quite a pathetic list of distortions, falsehoods and delusions. You should be ashamed of such a pathetic production.

1) That's a distortion of the truth. The Downing street memo does not say what you so fervently wish to believe it does. In England "fix" does not have the same slang meaning it does here.
2) "Chemical weapons"? If you mean white phosphorous, it was used for cover and for locating bomb targets for the jets. All high explosives are also "chemical weapons". This charge is absurd.
3) If you're talking about the Oil for Food scandal where UN and other foreigners took bribes and kicked back $25 billion to Saddam, that's not "digging up dirt", that's "exposing a heinous act of corruption".
4) No "torture" authorized (it has a very specific meaning). There were no POWs (applies only to legal combatants who wear uniforms and insignia and who follow the Geneva conventions themselves). Illegal combatants are not protected under Geneva conventions. Another missed opportunity to learn, eh?
5) Unfortunately, in active war zones, the wheels of justice turn slowly.
6) Prove. It.
7) Debunked. Thoroughly. By more intelligent people than you.
8) Debunked. Again. Loony conspiracy belief.
9) Now you're just being completely daft.
10) Distortion of truth.
11) It was OK when Clinton did this? It's not Bush that does this, you know...
12) A display of ignorance of the facts or economics. The gov of CA screwed up and legislated this disastrous policy. That's his own fault. Then he whined about it. Pathetic.
13) You can't even number sequentially correctly.
14) Please cite source. A legitimate news source if you can. Not necessarily a violation, anyway.
15) This was done by a State Dept flunky, and had nothing to do with the Bush administration. Anyway, she'd been riding a desk for years, after the CIA accidently released her name to the Russians in the late 90's. Again, not even a crime.

2006-12-21 13:07:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

If lawyers where worth a grain of salt they should be able to boot him & Cheney out! However Congress & the Senate are both dirty along with the supreme court system! Its all one big worthless mess for the legal citizens of USA! We need to end the current role of Representative Government in favor of majority rule & control by the legal citizens. We are no longer in the horse & buggy era, we are high tech comunications & should use it the advantage of the legal majority citizens,

2006-12-21 12:44:40 · answer #3 · answered by bulabate 6 · 3 0

You put a lot of time and effort into this one Ri. I feel sorry for you. You must not have a life. Do you need a boyfriend?

DO you think you're going to sway any elections or convert any voters by your polarized position. Do you want to find any common ground to the difficult problems facing the country today. The answers are not in the far left or the far right. They are in the middle.

Get over some of your hatred and try to move on. You are obviously more intelligent than many of the people here. Put some of that intelligence to use and run for political office instead of just shouting in the wind.

2006-12-21 15:31:39 · answer #4 · answered by Bill G 6 · 0 4

How could anyone pick just one??? The fact that he's President should be a reason in itself to impeach him!!!

2006-12-21 12:44:25 · answer #5 · answered by Damned fan 7 · 2 0

http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive_Index/Illegal_Weapons_in_Fallujah.html


Uh, Cynthia McKinney isn't in Congress anymore.

2006-12-21 12:42:46 · answer #6 · answered by unassailed 2 · 1 0

you forgot secure our borders even repubs have to admit thats an impeachable offense.

2006-12-21 14:02:10 · answer #7 · answered by sasuke 4 · 2 0

He won't get impeached

2006-12-21 12:36:51 · answer #8 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 2 0

(my wish)

16) Personally beating the crap out of hate mongers like yourself.

2006-12-21 12:37:58 · answer #9 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 0 5

None!!!

2006-12-21 12:41:31 · answer #10 · answered by Samantha Thompson 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers