Obviously it does not, according to the government's official 9/11 report where they claim a Jumbo Jet Airliner hit the Pentagon. There is only one hole in the Pentagon where the fuselage of the 757 hit the building, but nary a scratch where the two 12,000 pound engines HAD TO HAVE HIT THE BUILDING.
WOW, the laws of nature were inapplicable on 9/11. Isn't that amazing?
2006-12-21
04:32:28
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Internet Poster Child
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Talk about faith in government. When they determined that two 12,000 pound, 9 feet in diameter chunks of titanium and other metals traveling at over 200 mph hit the Pentagon and didn't even scratch the surface or break the glass windows, well, WOW. That is all I can say....WOW. I have so much faith in our elected officials that I'm not even going to question their explanation. It makes perfect sense. After all, they are the government and everyone knows that the government knows best and most importantly, is completely honest.
2006-12-21
04:35:46 ·
update #1
I wonder how much money some of you people are paid to spread the 9/11 lies?
2006-12-21
04:39:27 ·
update #2
The COMEDY category is where most of you belong.
2006-12-21
04:52:04 ·
update #3
.
.
OK, THE BELIEVERS IN THE GOVERNMENT WIN. I CANNOT FIGHT YOU ALL, BY MYSELF.
SURE, A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON.
OVER AND OUT.
.
.
2006-12-21
04:58:11 ·
update #4
Don't worry, when you die, I'll make sure I bring extra spray-paint to decorate your tomb.
2006-12-21 06:36:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you actually knew what you were talking about, you would know that the plane didn't just "hit" the pentagon. It crashed into the street, ground, other objects, and the pentagon. The wings were most likely sheared off before the main body hit the pentagon. Also, once the very first impact on a plane happens, it usually completely rips apart and sends crap every where.
Also, I do seem to remember there WAS a hole in the pentagon. Pretty big actually. you make it sound like there was no damage at all to the pentagon.
2006-12-21 12:45:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the structural damage from that much mass hitting the building in addition to fire damage would make things pretty unclear, don't you think? If you were hoping that someone would find two perfectly round circles matching the diameter of a jet engine, you need to review your physics. Assumingi you are one of those believing that the government of someone other than terrorists created 9/11, you need to explain this to those who actually witnessed the plane low to the ground and crashing into the building. It would also make perfect sense that a plane might go into the Pentagon after seeing it happen on television twice earlier that day to two other landmark buildings. The "laws of nature" you mention were applicable on 9/11. The problem is you don't understand parts of the law that mention precisely how structures react to devestating strikes and chemical fires. Those were applicable as well that day.
2006-12-21 12:42:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by TCSO 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, lets see now,,,there is the film of the jet hitting the building, the engines were attached to the wings which sheered off on impact, the windows were shattered around the impact site, the airplane parts that were positively identified as coming from the plane that crashed into the building and lets not forget the hundreds of eye witnesses to the event,,,add to that the fact that you are a mouth breathing moron who's parents were obviously related and I think we have our answer.
The only mystery here is how someone of your plainly diminished capacity is capable of using a computer. Time to turn it off now sonny, your parents will be home any minute now and they might not appreciate the way that you're making a fool of yourself. Go away now, run along and play.
2006-12-21 12:55:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by kfc13571 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am a 26 year fire captain on the D.C.F.D. I was there I saw ,you are wrong, there were a lot of things that were not shown and there are a lot of things you will never know, but remember this I did not see you there when I carried bodies and parts from the pentagon, I did not see you before this happened ,all I see is you trying to make this a harder situation than it already is and will be forever. Please be careful what you say, because people who are ignorant can sometimes make a bad situation a lot worse.
2006-12-21 12:56:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The last time I threw a 12,000 pound chunk of concrete at a metal surface at 250 MPH, I missed.
2006-12-21 13:03:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um...have you ever looked at the pictures? You're telling me that the stuff all over the place is not a plane? That the government had some involvement? Be more anti-American. Infact...get some freshair, your not thinking straight.
2006-12-21 12:38:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Squawkers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have had enough of you stupid conspiracy twits the hole IDIOT was more than big enough for the engines and the fuselage stop with the lies and half truths and stop wasting everyones time with this absolute nonsense. You want real conspiracies how about the testing of radiation on kids and mental patients. that's a real conspiracy.
2006-12-21 12:53:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by brian L 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess all that fuel that caught fire couldn't have melted those engines. Wait a second, there's someone reading my post! I better get off before they crash a jet into my computer!
2006-12-21 12:37:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by jay r 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go away, go chase Elvis and Bigfoot, you piece of trash. You disgrace this country and the memories of those that died that day with your idiotic question.
www.911myths.com
psst! terrorists exist!, pass it on.
2006-12-21 12:35:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by jasonzbtzl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋