Well, it sure is good that we're not all gay.
OR sterile.
OR elderly.
OR chaste.
OR priests.
But we have more than enough people who aren't any of those things to continue overpopulating the planet. Just because a lifestyle or situation doesn't result in children doesn't mean it can't fit in with the rest of the world.
2006-12-21 04:12:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
There would have to be forced reproduction to continue the human race. But while I have nothing against gay people, if everyone was gay there would be something wrong with the world. Same thing if everyone was straight. Our differences are what make us such a great species. While men and women were designed for the opposite sex, I believe that God (or whatever you think created and controls the universe) gave humans a brain to reason with. If a human makes a decision to be gay or straight then so be it as long as personal beliefs dont hurt others.
2006-12-21 12:12:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by dumpbullets 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
What a stupid question.
People are different. Some people have a problem with some of those differences, but that doesn't change the fact. I suppose there are a lot of people who would prefer it if all people were straight, just like there are a lot of people who'd prefer it if everybody was white. But nature is oblivious to human bigotry - that much is, or should be, crystal-clear.
To answer this ridiculous question - gee, I guess we'd have to turn to turkey basters and test tubes. Either that or just fix a lot of gay guys up with Madonna for drunken one-night stands.
2006-12-21 12:12:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by jonjon418 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
But we aren't all in the same catergory, some of us are gay, bisexual, asexual and straight. And some of those who are straight don't always have children and some people who have children can't even take care of them that they give them up for adoption. So, If a gay couple wanted children they can always adopt children and the reproductive process may or may not continue.
2006-12-21 12:24:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by What'd You Say? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Artificial Insemination
Surrogacy
In-vitro fertilization
Or a gay and a lez having actual sex and getting a baby. How many times do you need to have sex to have 2 or even 5 kids in a lifetime? That won't be too bad right?
Don't worry, we humans are in the league of roaches... we'll make it. ;)
2006-12-21 12:22:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I really do hate when people ask this question. Yeah, there'd be less children, but homosexuals are a MINORITY. That means there are way more straight people than gay people. And the straights are overpopulating the earth well enough as it is.
2006-12-21 12:28:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sebastian 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please stop dreaming ok? Because not everyone wants to be Gay. I'm female and another female can't do nothing for me but show me where a man is ok? Stop the madness now! There isn't a damn thing a woman can do for me. Why would I even want to be sexually involved with someone that has the same thing as me number one? And number two, if I needed a woman to use a strap on, common sense would tell me to just go get the original piece.
So please, let's not get it twisted! You may wish the entire planet was Gay but I am so, so glad that we still have straight men out here in the world that absolutely loves the sh!t out of us heterosexual women!
2006-12-21 12:12:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Simple: Women would use artificial insemination, Men would hire surrogate mothers.
Just think: NO unwanted pregnancies, NO need for abortions. NO overpopulation problem.
Sounds good to me, let's do that!
2006-12-21 12:27:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Harry_Cox 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
This question is non-sensical, or makes no sense. Its the same as asking if the sky were green would the grass be blue. In other words, its a "what if . . ." and these questions have as many answers as people answering them.
2006-12-21 12:52:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by AdamKadmon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe you dont have a clue what the word gay means and really need to meet some.
2006-12-21 12:10:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by tomy 3
·
3⤊
0⤋