http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/03/29/profile.mcveigh/
2006-12-21 02:29:31 · 12 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Sorry, but Timothy McVeigh "Was" a human.
2006-12-21 02:38:12 · update #1
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
2006-12-21 02:40:20 · update #2
That some are, yes it is fair to say. I consider motive the main reason you can classify someone. Pat Robertson (a noted conservative) called for the assassination of Hugo Chavez (a leader of another country). That Pat Robertson didn't do it himself doesn't change the fact that he called for others to do it (our own personal Muqtada al Sadr). I consider Pat Robertson a terrorist. Same with Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols.
However, only some are. You cannot lump all Republicans together as violent terrorists because some went violent (or called for violence). There are many good ones, and while I don't always agree with Colin Powell or John McCain or George Bush (I consider George Bush a good guy trying to do good, even if he did do some things evil his intentions weren't evil), I believe they are working for the greater good.
2006-12-21 02:35:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Republican are as patriotic as any other American and always keep the interest of their country. Love for weapons does not mean that the man was terrorist. Element of hate and revenge may control the behavior and in extreme circumstances man can do anything. He has no love and respect for a human life.His home life is tragedy.
2006-12-21 02:57:06 · answer #2 · answered by snashraf 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who hunted down McVeigh Christians Who captured Mc Veigh Christians Who fry-ed Mc Veigh Christians So it it reasonable to mention Christians care for terrorist and Muslims rejoice them ?
2016-09-03 17:15:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was a registered Republican "in his New York days". Did you not read that park. After he read that trash called the Turner Diaries, he went over to the dark side. I believe that, if you check, you'll see that Charles Manson was Registered as a Democrat so does that mean that some Democrats are deranged sex murderers and cult leaders?
2006-12-21 03:23:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How about, "Timothy McVeigh is a human, therefore some humans are terrorists"? No argument there.
2006-12-21 02:32:30 · answer #5 · answered by twicewise 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
There are radicals on each end of the spectrum. Obviously, you can't say that a party is a terrorist because one of them is a terrorist. That's like saying all Democrats are cheating, no good, bastards like Clinton. Or murdering con artists like Reno. I'm Republican and I'm not a terrorist...you're f***ing dumb
2006-12-21 02:34:09 · answer #6 · answered by Desiree D 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mc Veigh despised both parties. He was more of a separatist.
John Wayne Gacy was a democrat (it's on the net,along with a pic of Gacy and Roslyn Carter). Should people believe all dems are serial killers of boys and wear a clown costume?
2006-12-21 02:40:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, you can only say one republican is a terrorist.
Unless you go through all the terrorists and find their party affiliation and find out that more of them are terrorists than you can say some. But until than you can only say one.
2006-12-21 02:38:29 · answer #8 · answered by butterflykisses427 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
About as fair as saying some Democrats or Independents are terrorists, I guess.....
2006-12-21 02:33:03 · answer #9 · answered by YellaMelaDude 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Do you mean in the same way that whey you say liberals are pro-abortion, that some Democrats are baby killers?
Get a life and stop asking stupid questions.
2006-12-21 02:32:31 · answer #10 · answered by deerslyr_71 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋