2006-12-21 02:28:01 · 10 answers · asked by Snowshoe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, because "law and order" is not the hot topic of the time. Crime rates are down and the Supreme Court hasn't been particularly generous toward accused criminals in a long time.
2006-12-21 02:37:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Social liberal and economic conservatives are maximum probably going to selection between a average democrat/republican to a libertarian. the two events right this moment look to stroll hand and hand with vast government, this is antithetical to being fiscally conservative. Democrats interior the previous have balanced the budge extra suitable than republicans, yet i could be hesitant to call them fiscally conservative for the reason that that represents a small federal government--as a replace they have been extra fiscally accountability. Clinton did have help from a republican controlled Congress. Reagan had Carter's mess to freshen up, decrease the utmost marginal tax expenditures from 70%-30%, spurned economic growth, fiscally outspend the Russian's to help win the chilly war (mutually as hindsight mentioned he would have decrease back on economic costs), mutually as lowering federal government. this is a no longer difficulty-free election for a economic conservative/social liberal guy or woman. you're the two going to vote libertarian or take a gamble and vote McCain hoping he's taking a different course than vast government George Bush or you will reluctantly help Obama for the reason that he his socially liberal, yet some distance from being a economic conservative.
2016-12-11 13:36:27 · answer #2 · answered by vasim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and to top it off Giuliani could draw in a lot of the old style Democratic voters who are for fiscal responsibility, something the current crop of Democrat liberals can't do.
2006-12-21 02:52:00 · answer #3 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. There is no such thing as a 100% conservatively pure candidate, so we accept those that offer significant ability to at least do what's right for America.
We would never have an ideological purity putcsh like what happened to Lieberman.
2006-12-21 02:51:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would you want them to? surely a strong law en order program coupled to a moderate and commonsence social outlook = a good man to have in office?
Im a Brit conservative and a monarchist, but even i have to concead that a balance must be struck between rightwing realism and leftwing idealism... the two blend well when viewed objectively and with out partisan politics getting in the way.
Grow up and reap the rewards of a balenced candidate with mass appeal from all walks of life.... WHY COUDNT YOU FIND A PRESIDENT WITH THE SAME VIRTUES!!!!!
2006-12-21 05:03:14 · answer #5 · answered by Zarathustra 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. And he will return the party to the conservatives...that is, if the republican party is at all interested in returning to conservatism. Even so called 'socially liberal ideas' are conservative...less government, less laws, less religion in government.
2006-12-21 02:31:25 · answer #6 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His socially liberal ideas are to just make him appear more moderate
And it is obviously working on liberals, I like that a lot, because his ideas are really good
2006-12-21 02:33:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
What's he get $100 million in Federal funds for declaring his run.
That's enough to buy a lifetimes of friends
Go big Red Go
2006-12-21 02:33:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. IF he runs, he will start as the leading candidate overall.
2006-12-21 02:36:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
2006-12-21 02:31:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋