The laws of physics never change. How could building 7 have collapsed without a controlled demolition?
2006-12-21 01:46:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anthony M 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey, mnvike watch who you call names because a plane did not crash into building 7. If falling debris caused the collapse, why didn't it collapse the closer smaller structures around it.
2006-12-21 10:21:26 · update #1
Not one person has accused any firefighters with any crimes. Your creating strawmen now. Strawman - a weak or sham argument set up to be easily refuted.
You make up lies and/or listen to other peoples lies, no matter the merit, simply to discredit the movement.
2006-12-21 10:25:28 · update #2
Controlled demolition doesn't violate the laws of physics. Neither does 'pull it'.
2006-12-21 01:51:33 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Popular Mechanics has explained this very thing:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
It's on Page 5.
FIRE STORM: WTC 7 stands amid the rubble of the recently collapsed Twin Towers. Damaged by falling debris, the building then endures a fire that rages for hours. Experts say this combination, not a demolition-style implosion, led to the roofline "kink" that signals WTC 7's progressive collapse. PHOTOGRAPH BY NEW YORK OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
2006-12-21 01:52:20 · answer #2 · answered by Perdendosi 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The massive stress of air moving at great speeds at angles that had never been anticipated in the construction of the buildings.
The massive stress of the foundation being moved with the incredible impact of having millions of tons of two enormous buildings coming down quickly.
The wieght of the rubble pressing and compacting the earth around the foundations of the building sending sysmic shock waves throughout the structure.
The flaws that had existed, as in every aged building, were transformed by all these factors that had never been anticipated when it was constructed.
And by the by, all these 'conspiracy theories' have been traced back to the Middle-East Terror groups, in a divide and conquer propoganda campaign. The onus of proof is on the conspiracy theorists and they have failed to prove anything.
The truth stands that the suicide bombers created a situation of such destruction it had never been experienced nor anticipated in the construction of these buildings. NATO was attacked.
2006-12-21 02:31:58 · answer #3 · answered by northstar 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
lol people who argue stuff like this are retarded. science is just that- science. there are so many variables when a plane smashes into a building at 400 miles an hour you cant figure out exactly how the building will collapse by doing a simple equation or two. i know you conspiracy theorists think youre pretty smart, but youre really not. give it a rest.
2006-12-21 02:07:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Physics pertains to depend. whilst one is connected with God, one not greater is interior the ambit of physics or actual regulation yet is with Metaphysical or Quantum regulations or religious realm and previous. religious is that which pertains to the Spirit or the Being interior of.for people who lives interior the actual international the strikes of people who has transcended the actual plane might appear as if breaking the actual regulations while they are of their own eyes and the God's eyes interior the actual besides through fact the Quantum regulations. with the intention to have the bigger inventive and prescient one has to scale the Mountain height; nonetheless some are myopic or the possibility of eye is limited, despite if there's no fog to ward off the view. The deceptiveness is interior the beholder.whose potential to establish is constrained interior the textile levels of his information.
2016-10-15 09:09:15 · answer #5 · answered by dickirson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It had several tons of buildings 1 and 2 fall down on it causing massive structural damage. The resulting fires eventually weakened it to the point of collapse. Why is this so hard to accept?
2006-12-21 02:18:02 · answer #6 · answered by Michael C 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the best trading software http://tradingsolution.info
i have attended a lot of seminars, read counless books on forex trading and it all cost me thousands of dollars. the worst thing was i blew up my first account. after that i opened another account and the same thing happened again. i started to wonder why i couldn,t make any money in forex trading. at first i thought i knew everything about trading. finally i found that the main problem i have was i did not have the right mental in trading. as we know that psychology has great impact on our trading result. apart from psychology issue, there is another problem that we have to address. they are money management, market analysis, and entry/exit rules. to me money management is important in trading. i opened another account and start to trade profitably after i learnt from my past mistake. i don't trade emotionally anymore.
if you are serious about trading you need to address your weakness and try to fix it. no forex guru can make you Professional trader unless you want to learn from your mistake.
2014-12-18 13:43:37 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aliens
2006-12-21 01:47:43 · answer #8 · answered by Abu 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Explain the San Francisco earthquakes!
Were THEY done by controlled demolition?
Did George Bush plant explosives under the city to kill all of the homosexuals???
Think about it...
2006-12-21 01:48:32 · answer #9 · answered by i hate hippies but love my Jesus 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah!
Controlled demolition.
Big insurance dollars were to be had.
2006-12-21 01:56:24 · answer #10 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋