They are the same strategy by the same people and should have the same results. The war on drugs is a smokescreen. What it really is about is eliminating all mind expanding drugs which might wake up the population to the evils going on around them. Those were the drugs that inspired the anti-war movement in the sixties. They were effectively eliminated so that war was successful. Those drugs were replaced by designer drugs like, coke, crack, and meth which have a much higher profit potential for the big boys, and divide and depress the population into submission and ignorance.
The war on terror is also a smokescreen. We never went after Bush's family friend Osama, instead going after the oil pipeline across Afghanistan and Dominion over the region and the plunder of Iraq and the US Treasury.
The Bush family is involved in both wars, surprise, surprise.
2006-12-21 01:41:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
And while the government was deciding to make drugs legal, the innocent citizens were suffering the consequences of being attacked by raving drug addicts while walking home from work. Great place, Amsterdam. No wonder so many damn tourists go missing over there, only to turn up years later as homeless bums trying to make a living with the rats because they blew off their money on drugs. Yeah, best place in the world.
Not.
2006-12-21 06:43:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No we will not in any respect win the war on drugs, wanting killing approximately ninety 9% of the persons interior the country. There are basically too many people to administration the situation to the factor that we are able to win. Sorry yet i'm a realist in this. i'm involved in legalizing prostitution. it would basically be yet in any different case to get earnings tax. heavily the persons who pass there understand the risks and deserve the risks. drugs on the different hand may be risky TO ME. those people can pass loopy and attack whilst they are intense, or choose a fix so undesirable they scouse borrow FROM ME, so it quite is MY company.
2016-10-15 09:09:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by dickirson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally yes.
I used to be a major pot head and now I only smoke it once in like 8 years...so yeah thats a victory for me.
But the "War on drugs" is a joke. More problems with drugs were created when the "war on drugs" started.
I remember in school we had the D.A.R.E program. I would have to look up what DARE actually stood for cause I was too stoned to remember. Good majority of us were stoned out of our minds wearing DARE t-shirts given to us by the school...paid with tax dollars. Alot of wasted money!
2006-12-21 01:50:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. The war on drugs was just a way to look like something was being done, but it will never be successful. All statistics point to a complete failure.
The war on terror is no different. When will they learn you can't wage war on a noun?
2006-12-21 01:49:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Webber 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Legalize it, and i will advertise it. that is true my friend, marijuana should be legal, and ( insert persuasive speech here) but winning the war on drugs would be extremely difficult when we have such a stern right wing conservative in office. we should all just move to amsterdam, prostitution and marijane are legal, ive been there.its amayyyyyyyyyyyyyyzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeennnnnnnnnnnnnn!
2006-12-21 01:49:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dr. Helpful 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sure, just like we're winning the war in Iraq.
2006-12-21 01:42:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
America was liek "scroo this; war on durgs is imposible" I hope we realize we're doing the same thing with terror. YOU CAN'T KILL AN IDEA.
2006-12-21 01:41:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hydrox Z 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
You don't like whores?POT and whores go together like cap't crunch and milk!Did you know the government is building a buttload of concentration camps(google that term and see for yourself),makes you wander who those camps are for,don't it?
2006-12-21 02:46:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by studdmuffynn 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The two go hand in hand. one supports the other. People are starting to see this threw education...it's only a matter of time now.
2006-12-21 01:44:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by steve 5
·
2⤊
0⤋