2006-12-21 01:20:01 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually, according the NYT, the new death toll has reached 26.1 million making Iraq the first country with a negative population.
2006-12-21 01:27:59 · answer #1 · answered by laohutaile 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Politics. The biggest popularity contest ever. A women has the "right" to get herself laid and then murder the results cause she was too stupid to do it "safely". Or not do it at all but that would make too much sense. The war in Iraq is unpopular with people so defending it would cause them to look bad. The object is to win elections. If they thought that arguing against abortion and for the war would make them popular then guaranteed they would. It is complete hypocrisy and is undefendable. Weak excuses that fall down on their face don't count as a defence. Lol. Answers will be awesome. Nice question by the way.
2016-05-23 04:55:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is the source of the joint John Hopkins University/ lancet medical journal study on Iraq
"As many as 654,965 more Iraqis may have died since hostilities began in Iraq in March 2003 than would have been expected under pre-war conditions"
http://www.jhsph.edu/publichealthnews/press_releases/2006/burnham_iraq_2006.html
There have indeed been over 500 Iraqi deaths per day since the invasion, but the western media chooses not to report this, I know they rarely leave the green zone, but the statistics are available.
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/15/1432233
2006-12-21 01:38:13 · answer #3 · answered by Ringo G. 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I hate when crazy conservatives make claims about "liberal lies" be honest, you got this infromation from FoxNews didn't you?
ya... thats what I thought... the only "liberal" interaction you've probably had was with Hannity and Colmes... and even there he's not allowed to say relevant things because FoxNews is the conservative corporate media capitol.
Stop blaming FoxNews errors on liberals when its really the conservatives making up lies to cover for their Foley's (thats a pun by the way, Mark Foley/ folly, as in an error)
2006-12-21 01:41:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
how do you know it's a lie? have you ever allowed the idea that maybe it's not to truly develop in your mind, or is it closed to ideas not in keeping with your previous thought on the matter? it's easy to dismiss it as untrue b/c the consequences and ramifications of it, if it were true, would be too much for your limited scope? might you undergo a system crash??
my point is, #1 i personally think the liars are the bush administration - if people knew what was really going on over there they'd be pissed. and #2, i'm not sure if that number is a million yet.
might you be upset if it were? would that be too much to ask?
2006-12-21 01:27:33 · answer #5 · answered by izaboe 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Just wait until the likes of Michael Moore, Tah-ray-zuh Heinz Kerry, Matt Damon, and Liza Minelli get a hold of this news.
Tales grow taller on down the line.
2006-12-21 01:24:06 · answer #6 · answered by MaryCheneysAccessory 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It's always good to hear from you brave souls on the front line in Iraq.
2006-12-21 01:30:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No not yet.
I think the Republicans are still agreeing on 350,000 or so.
But they were always a little slow.
**********
Just out of interest - didn't they use the same method to calculate the Darfu body count?
When is that figure going to grow - never ending these method of counting dead peoples
**********
Anyway, you gona have a BBQ when it does or something?
I support your war of terror !!
2006-12-21 01:26:04 · answer #8 · answered by speedball182 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think I hear them snapping their dirty fingers at the press. I predict the fictional level will be reached by tomorrow.
2006-12-21 01:31:44 · answer #9 · answered by Lana Lang 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, not yet. Wait until election time rolls around again.
2006-12-21 01:24:01 · answer #10 · answered by DA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋