I am talking about CREDIBLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. NOT WORDS. NOT bad video that a school child could have made up that shows what could be an Osama look-alike reading a book. NOTHING BUT PURE, PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.
I want to see CREDIBLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that what happened on September 11, 2001 was as Bush has told us. CREDIBLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, NOT WORDS.
Do you get it yet? CREDIBLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.
There is a TON of credible physical evidence that says Bush and a portion of our own government conjured up the whole terrorist thing, but NONE, in my and millions of others opinion, that says BushCo, Inc. is telling the truth about 9/11. And if that is the case, and it is, then every single thing he has done since has been based on fictitious information and is therefore TRAITOROUS/TREASON.
2006-12-21 01:17:33 · 22 answers · asked by Internet Poster Child 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
PEOPLE, TRY TO FOCUS. IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO SHOW ME/US ONE SHRED OF CREDIBLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THAT BUSH IS TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11.
This is not about me proving anything to you. You need to convince ME.
2006-12-21 01:23:00 · update #1
.
.
Bush's paid support is out in force today! LMAO
.
.
2006-12-21 01:26:14 · update #2
There is none. No video around the Pentagon? C'mon! The Pentagon has to be crawling with cameras and nothing picked up of an airplane crashing into it? How about Shanksville, no bodies? I am not usually a conspiracy theorist, but I am wondering.
2006-12-21 01:27:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
We all know the reasons for invading Iraq were based on faulty intelligence. As well, we all know that 2 planes did hit the WTC. Aside from that, no one knows. Personally , I find it extremely difficult to believe Bush has the brains to be behind 9-11. I've watched some of the conspiracy videos and will agree that there are many , many questions that should be openly answered but you will not find any credible evidence to support the Bush administration's position or to impeach it. There is way too much unanswered about 9-11 and there are undeniable ties to the Bin Laden family and the Bush's. I'm not ready to believe an American President was involved but I am still waiting for the answer to who allowed Bin Laden's family members to fly out of the U.S. while all air traffic was grounded on Sept. 11.
2006-12-21 01:30:23 · answer #2 · answered by Bob D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jet fuel won't burn hot enough to melt steel, not even hot enough to warp it. Wiki the figures.
WTC 7 wasn't hit by anything but small bits of flaming debris, yet it fell into its own footprint same as the towers. All the supporting columns JUST HAPPENED to fail all at once. YouTube/Google/Wiki probably has the video, go look it up. If that's not a controlled demolition, I don't know what is.
There were military exercises going on that day involving planes attacking NYC; AF bases were within 15 minutes flight, more than enough time after the hijackings were confirmed to intercept. Yet 3 planes hit their targets without so much as a peep.
Norman Mineta(Transportation Chief@ the time) was with Cheney on 9/11. IIRC, they were watching the plane headed toward the Pentagon, and Mineta asked Cheney if "the orders still stand". Nothing stopped that plane from hitting the Pentagon, so what were these orders? Stand-down orders to allow the attacks to happen?
The administration had plans to invade Afghanistan by the end of October, plans drawn up long before 9/11 occurred. The attacks were just another Reichstag fire, creating a pretext for war and clamping down on civil liberties. Why did we need the Patriot Act? Why did we need Gitmo? Why did we need to suspend Habeas Corpus? Why did NSA need to wiretap millions of citizens and lie about it? Why can Bush disregard any law he signs(in direct contravention of the Constitution) and get away with it?
WHERE ARE YOUR PAPERS, CITIZEN? WELCOME TO THE NEW AMERICAN POLICE STATE!
2006-12-21 02:00:23 · answer #3 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush would not know the truth if it hit him in the face. The idiot is a lying so and so along with his whole family who have been licking the @sses of the Saudis from day one. Who smuggled their (Saudi) families in broad day light out of the United Sates while the Towers were smoldering in ashes and all Air travel grounded? What was the pressure and urgency?
The Bush Inc, International Gangsters have fooled the American people thru intimidation, lies and gross treason. They should all be prosecuted along with Bush's underwear Tony Blair for WAR CRIMES.
What they have done in this Century makes the last World War look like a picnic.
When the Saudis F*A*R*T this White House runs to the Saudi Tents as receipients of the smell and come out with smiles on their faces. Did you see how crooked Chenney ran to Saudi Arabia when he was summoned by the Nomad King after election and came back to US like a dog with tail between his legs?
Reason - Orders from the Head Saudi F*A*R*T* to send more Americans to die in RAQ so that his Kingdom of Hell can be saved - who do you think Bush really works for - definitly not the American People.
2006-12-21 01:43:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dear Internet Child,
I fail to understand how you missed the video played (for about a year) showing jets crashing into the WTC. Or perhaps you thought that was creative pyrotechnics and photography. Was Dreamworks involved in the conspiracy? Pixar?
Or did you also miss the video footage of Osama Bin Ladin SAYING he had planned 9/11, and mentioning the bombers while bragging to some sheik?
It never fails to surprise me that people such as yourself will ignore obvious evidence while embracing internet conspiracies with no evidence whatsoever.
2006-12-21 01:30:46 · answer #5 · answered by Eric K 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You're still alive. Think about it. If Bush would have no qualms about killing 3000 Americans to start a war, why would he keep you alive for accusing him?
Since you made the accusation, you show us ONE SHREAD of CREDIBLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that Bush is lying. You say there is "a TON of credible physical evidence that says Bush and a portion of our own government conjured up the whole terrorist thing," so you should have no trouble at all conjuring it up.
2006-12-21 01:23:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You've got it backwards junior. I don't need to convince you, and wouldn't waste my time even trying. Like Dorothy Parker once said, you can lead a swine to knowledge but you can't make it think. You need to convince me that you aren't in need of medication and a rubber room. So far you and your ilk haven't produced one single shred of evidence, unlike the ton that you claim to have, and this new strategy that you "inside job" retards have been pushing, demanding that sane people prove themselves right since you can't even come close to proving that you have a case, just shows how desperate you're getting.
What's the matter kid, have you just noticed that the whole world is laughing at you? This, and the "we'll pay a million dollars to anyone who can prove the negative" crap is just a pathetic cry for attention.
The burden of proof isn't mine, I don't have to prove anything in this case and you have failed to shoulder the burden of proof for your idiot theories. Go away kid, you aren't funny anymore and we're tired of you.
2006-12-21 04:32:18 · answer #7 · answered by kfc13571 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Instead of talking about it, show us all this evidence. I watched the video that purported to prove the plane hitting the Pentagon was really a missile and almost wet myself laughing it the spurious and improbable conclusions the pro conspiracy nuts came up with. Do you have something that a rational person of reasonable intelligence can watch or more comedy like that one?
2006-12-21 01:29:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"There is a TON of credible physical evidence that says Bush and a portion of our own government conjured up the whole terrorist thing..."
Yeah, right. Show me THAT.
2006-12-21 01:20:27 · answer #9 · answered by hellcat 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
2016-05-23 04:55:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋