2006-12-21 00:21:04 · 40 answers · asked by Alyosha 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
She was our beloved queen of hearts.
She had nice eyes, her t its were nothing special though.
Yeah, she was a good looking girl- probably the BEST looking royal for hundreds of years. What's your problem?
2006-12-21 00:24:06 · answer #1 · answered by Not Ecky Boy 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
About a 4 on a scale of 10.
2006-12-21 00:29:49 · answer #2 · answered by ronhawk62 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What made Diana so outstanding was how she looked compared to traditional royals. Let's face it, the royal family was never going to win any beauty contests but all you have to do is look at her sons to see what Britts were so excited about when she became engaged to Charles. Those 2 boys LOOK like princes from a fairy tale. They will look a lot better on stamps than their Daddy - that's for sure.
2006-12-21 00:32:00 · answer #3 · answered by Queen of Cards 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think she was a saint at all. I found her to be mentally unstable, attention-seeking, manipulative, selfish and narcissistic. The only reason she was seen as beautiful was that the rest of the family she married into all look like inbred horses, and on a relative scale, she didn't.
She got her come-uppance by acting like a sl*ut to gain attention. Examine the facts regarding the number of men she slept with in order to further her ends, and if she really thought that the establishment were going to let her carry-on in that fashion, and marry an undesirable alien whose father had been refused British citizenship on several occasions, it would have been in her best interests to have thought again, and pretty bloody quickly.
2006-12-21 00:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Phish 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Did anybody ever find Ghandi outstandingly beautiful? How about Mother Teresa? Give your heads a shake you shallow meat heads.
2006-12-21 00:37:27 · answer #5 · answered by heathen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't her looks that made her " Outstandingly beautiful" It was her personality that also helped. Yes she was attractive, but her strength, warmth, caring nature was what made her outstandingly beautiful. And lets face it she is so much better looking then Camilla!
2006-12-21 00:29:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was not that everyone said she was beautiful or outstandingly a gorgeous woman. I think it was the captivating shyness at first that caught everyone and got them to look at a so called fairy princess. Besides, anyone that stood beside big ears would look at least half decent, even the horse he is married to now.
2006-12-21 00:25:08 · answer #7 · answered by colinhughes333 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well to be fair the royal family ain't the best looking people in the world so in comparison to the majority she was beautiful but in comparison to the population nope she was just an ok looking woman.
2006-12-21 03:15:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I would not call her a Saint either....a good humanitarian, a good person, but not a saint. I don't think she was stunningly beautiful either, however.....she was a beautiful person, she did stand for helping others, and such and I think that will always be remembered.
2006-12-21 05:13:09 · answer #9 · answered by SM M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no.
errr, she wasn't a saint either.
generally a nice person - yes. saint, no
Of course you could also argue that she was off with her boyfriend, leaving 2 kids behind, in a speeding car with no seatbelt with a driver who was drunk and drugged up.
If she was a "normal" person on a council estate just how many people would have slagged her off, not said how tragic and blameless she was.
No one should be stupid enough to get into a car with a drunk driver.
2006-12-21 00:31:13 · answer #10 · answered by Michael H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see what you mean but she was a million times more beautiful than princess Ann, and other female royals
2006-12-21 01:57:52 · answer #11 · answered by zanoshi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋