Can the Democratic Party not see that the war in Iraq is against foreign terrorists in Iraq who are stirring up strife between the different factions in Iraq. Can the Democratic Party not see that terrorists from around the world have entered into Iraq and that the terrorists are simply trying to destroy the spread of democracy. Does the Democratic Party not see the importance of establishing democracy in the Middle East? Does the Democratic Party think that we are safe in U.S.A. with terrorists roaming freely around Iraq, Syria and Iran?
2006-12-19 22:19:25 · 19 answers · asked by ofthehighest 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Liberal Democrats will give this country to Muslim extremists as soon as they have enough power. They have Americans hating the Republicans enough to gain control this election. Hillary could very well be the next Commander in Cheif of the armed forces in a few years.
I don't hear the Extremists say "leave us alone and we'll leave you alone". They want to rule the world.
2006-12-19 22:51:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Not all Democrats deny the dangers posed in Iraq, or the nature of the current situation. The rhetoric on the war is overblown by many. Many are still locked in the justification issue and cannot properly understand that justification no longer matters as anything other than a tool to place blame. I believe we are doing the right thing in Iraq because I have believed since 91 that Hussein needed to be removed from power, but I would be lying if I said that I thought Iraq posed a significant threat to the United States before the war. The thing that distresses me most is Democratic Senators who feel they have a right to negotiate with Syria in defiance of Administration policy. If our government truly becomes divided with different fiefdoms warring against each other for control we will have much larger problems as a result than even the threat terrorists pose.
2006-12-19 22:34:24 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did anyone else notice that the questioner did not provide any explaination as to why he belives the Democrats are not aware of this (alleged) situation. The Democrtats support a $160 billion appropriation for the war in Iraq. Why is that not a demonstrable example of their recognizing the importance of the military initiative in Iraq?
This guy needs to turn off Hannity once in awhile.
2006-12-19 22:51:22 · answer #3 · answered by Timothy B 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don’t understand how or why human beings can nonetheless imagine that Iraq conflict has some thing to do with terrorism. With as we talk’s technologies you'll imagine maximum human beings understand what's extremely occurring. we've get admission to to this kind of large number of elements of information lately. i'd extremely desire and pray that you keep in mind that at this factor i extremely don’t care what get at the same time is interior the white residing house see you later as they help us out of the mess we are in. we've a lot extra to be stricken about then Iraq. At this factor we've embarrassed ourselves as a rustic. We invaded a rustic for earnings with out any regard. we've positioned a huge wedge between us and Russia a rustic that we were in a chilly conflict with for years. Do you've any theory how China feels about us at present? are you able to even initiate to appreciate how hated the human beings are in most of the international. i'm unable to understand the way you may imagine the Democrats can do a worse pastime then what has already been performed to us. Our freedom has been stripped from us with the patriot act. by way of Patriot act now those who used to strive against for animal rights are called terrorist. The Republicans were in workplace and took us years backward in this international. in the experience that they stay in workplace we would nicely be the subsequent third international u . s .. As for the terrorist question. I have some questions myself. If all of us replaced into fearful about terrorist then why did we not first fix the boarders and be extra careful on who comes into the u . s . a .? My 2d question is that if we were so fearful then why did we not locate the guy who replaced into meant to be to blame interior the fist position? that is an previous guy on a dialysis gadget and we couldn’t locate him!!! yet we began a 2d conflict with a diverse u . s .. All what now seems interior the call of terrorism. Do you ever question some thing you word on television or are you basically that gullible? Oh any with the help of ways if Iran, N. Korea, Russia and China meet up because we do some thing 0.5 as stupid because the conflict in Iraq your going to choose all we had replaced into that little terrorist worry. I basically pray this international receives with the help of all of this with out international conflict 3.
2016-12-01 00:04:21 · answer #4 · answered by korniyenko 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America has a one party political system masquerading as two parties. Politicians obey campaign contributors, not the common people. Rich people fund both political parties. And rich people win every election. When I say rich, I mean billionares. Whether the the Republicans rule or the Democrats rule, policy continues about the same with a little variation. Because rich people continue ruling. Politics in this country is rich versus poor, not democrat versus republican.
2006-12-19 22:43:38 · answer #5 · answered by Roland 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What do the democrats have to do with anything anyway.
They aren't even in power yet!
Besides the terrorists weren't in Iraq like you say until the US was there. They were in Afganistan,Iran and Pakistan.
2006-12-19 22:36:30 · answer #6 · answered by Enigma 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We invaded a country that had nothing to do with terrorism. All that mess started after we invaded Iraq. As for democracy it usually works better when someone chooses it rather than to have someone else shove it down their throat.
2006-12-20 02:45:45 · answer #7 · answered by j 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Does the Repugnican party not see that terrorists are converging there BECAUSE of Bush's 'war' against a country not involved in 9/11 at all. Bush made that happen when he lied about WDMs..
2006-12-19 22:41:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your last sentence contradicts your own question...!
viz: having claimed that - "all the terrorists in the world have congregated in Iraq" - you finish off with - "terrorists roaming freely around Iraq, Syria and Iran"...!!!
2006-12-19 22:24:07 · answer #9 · answered by TruthHurts 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
ALL the terrorists in the world? What is it? Like a big convention or something? Oh no, must be the Christmas get-together.
Doesn't it strike you as strange that there seem to be terrorists where ever the US military turns up? Jesus!
2006-12-19 22:28:32 · answer #10 · answered by massadaman 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Shhhhhhhhhhh! Didn't you know you weren't supposed to write that! A terrosrist on a 10-jihad break might read this (I know they are glued to Yahoo Answers and MySpace)... so don't let the cat out of the bag.
2006-12-19 22:27:57 · answer #11 · answered by jh 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋