i would i mean 100 grand is alot of money. but after i would be taking a shower for a long time.
2006-12-19 21:19:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmmm.... Very difficult and under no circumstances to point ineffective question. Given those 2 options... i'd bypass with Oprah. If Martha were 20 years youthful, i'd reply in yet in a unique way. -Dio
2016-12-01 00:03:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by korniyenko 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well Oprah is cute, Rosie does not like the meat whistle and Martha is just a crusty old broad.
2006-12-19 21:32:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by lbuajlw 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i wouldn't even want to hear about a 4 some with those 3 in it
2006-12-19 21:22:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell yes. I would do it for only a couple grand. Actually, I think I would for $1,000. It's only sex, and it's $100,000....duh.
2006-12-19 21:19:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by drummerzac1 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Like i said before...I'd rather masturbate with broken glass...for half that ammount!
2006-12-19 21:22:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by RoninShonen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ick. No thank you. I prefer human love.
2006-12-19 21:21:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by tankgirl190 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would rather die or listen to a k-fed single
whichever is worse
♥Sëåšǿή˘š░ĠгЄЄŧιήġ΅š♦
2006-12-19 21:20:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no way they are all gross an unatractieve. you can not pay me enouff to see ither of them undressed.
2006-12-19 21:19:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by scooprandell 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm ready when's the party????
2006-12-19 21:20:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sexy Mama 1
·
1⤊
0⤋