English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I believe Brad Childress would drop him from the Vikings. I say this because this is the 3rd time this year that Johnson has been arrested and Childress has a no tolerence policy that he follows.

2006-12-19 22:54:55 · answer #1 · answered by jrollo76 4 · 0 0

Umm im assuming you mean keep him on the team and to answer the question no I cant name a team who wouldnt have kept Tank Johnson on the team. Why would anyone get rid of him? B/c he had some guns in his house? Who cares....

2006-12-20 04:45:11 · answer #2 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 0 0

The Steelers may not have. The Rooney's have a history of getting rid of players like that. Remember Bam Morris. He was caught with Possession following Superbowl 30. The Steelers went and got Bettis to replace him and as soon as Morris plead guilty her was cut.

2006-12-20 08:34:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Marvin Lewis has instituted a no tolerance policy in an effort to clean up the Bengals image after all those arrests I beleive anybody who gets arrested from this point on goes inactive until their name is cleared or Lewis decides they missed enough action.

2006-12-20 07:14:49 · answer #4 · answered by Adam 4 · 0 0

I have to agree that the Vikings would probably have cut him, as they are definitely trying to clean up their image.
As for the comment about him being promoted to team captain of the Bengals, no truer words have ever been spoken. He would be the leader of Marvin's Mafia!

2006-12-20 11:20:47 · answer #5 · answered by biggieou 2 · 0 0

Steelers would have cut him...they are no nonsense

if he was a Bengal, he would've been promoted to team captain

2006-12-20 08:52:10 · answer #6 · answered by thuglife 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers