Would you rather live in a land where if you say the wrong thing you will dissapear, where there is Martial Law? You have no rights...
Or would you rather live in a land absent of law. No law, no Justice no courts....if someone commits a crime there is no police
Dictatorship or Anarchy....what would you prefer?
2006-12-19 19:38:23 · 8 answers · asked by Darkness 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Anarchy, definately anarchy. I will NOT give up my freedom for security. I am the master of chaos...I would be quite at home in anarchy...bring it on....
2006-12-19 19:47:17 · answer #1 · answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was tempted to say dictatorship at first, but then I changed my mind. Under the authoritarian government, your chances of changing the system to something better are very slim. Although anarchy is a pretty unsafe situation for all, I think that human nature would eventually (rather quickly) begin to take over and people would start forming small groups, which would merge with other like-minded groups and suddenly you have a rudimentary society - one that is better than a dictatorship.
2006-12-19 21:15:24 · answer #2 · answered by baldisbeautiful 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Judging from many episodes of history, many people would go for authotitarianism, on the grounds that the individual was "our sort of dictator" rather than face an alternate unsympathetic or uncertain form of government.
Me, I'm at the other end of the scale. Anarchism can swiftly develop anarcho-syndicalism (The is no absolute law, but individuals generally do better in communities, which do require laws) assuming the possibility of complete anarchy.
2006-12-19 20:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anarchy isn't a chance due too the social nature of people. each authorities on earth is both a covert or overt dictatorship. at the same time as we are in delusion land i would like too stay in a actual democracy yet would settle for anarchy.
2016-11-30 23:59:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
False dichotomy.
In COMPLETE anarchy you wouldn't live very long.
I've lived in authoritarian states and despotism sucks - I know it's corny, I know it's been said before, but it's 100% true - not because of secret police and people vanishing, which doesn't happen all that often, but simply because of the mentality it creates, everybody waiting for direction from above.
But still, in complete anarchy your life would be nasty, brutish and short. Just as well that it scarcely ever exists. Man is a social animal.
2006-12-20 07:02:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As the world awakens to a higher awareness of consciousness and responsibility, the need for any rule of law will diminish to the point that one day no law will be required. Everyone will see they can create without infringing on others, nor can others infringe on them their creations.
2006-12-19 20:36:56 · answer #6 · answered by Wade C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are different name of Evil...
my choice would be dictatorship though
2006-12-19 19:53:33 · answer #7 · answered by junaid375 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anarchy and a big Gun...
2006-12-19 19:54:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋