English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The last five decades the country has seen very high acts of terrorism mostly emenating from Kashmir issue.We have lost many many human beings,the families awere destroyed ,some sect of community displaced out of place, but the ministries either at State or Central remained as spectators for all these happenings.As per special act -370 no other Indian can either buy or sell property in Kashmir land thus paving way for more concentration for select community to continue thier barabaric acts in the name religion and weakening the structure of India.So why every citizen of India represent Parliament to abolish such irrelevant acts so as to make Kashmir more safe for living for our own Indians?If any of selfish Politician counteracts this proposal, he must hanged to death in public place without any mercy? Some times We need to act like Godsey,Ravana,Kamsa..to counter act the inhumanistic creatures acting just for thier identity and fundamentalism with some foreign aid and provacations.

2006-12-19 14:20:55 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

first of all, i have to say, that although i do agree with you that it might be time to review article 370 of the constitution (it's the article of the constitution of India that defines the special provisions relating to the state of Jammu and Kashmir), I really do not think that a very fundamentalist approach like hanging anyone who opposes your idea of fundamentalism is particularly wise.
also before any discussion is possible regarding article 370 a couple of things must be kept in mind
1] the act was put in place to consolidate J and K as a part of the Indian territory
2]it's an article of the constitution, so it has to be amended. in an ideal situation an amendment should be carried out only after a huge amount of public debate and advocacy else, just like you feel very strongly against the article, people who feel very strongly for the article will want to hang people in the other camp.

clearly in our country the topic can't be broached without a huge risk of communal tension. so perhaps it is best to start discussing the relevance of the article, but in a truly democratic way.

however, having said that, i agree that many provisions of the article are very harsh on the citizens on JnK. the ban on sale of land is possibly a deterrent to economic development which could be a part of the solution to the JnK problem.

2006-12-20 12:28:25 · answer #1 · answered by fly 2 · 0 0

There are many , many problems existing as a result of wrong decisions in the past, this is just one of them. 370 should be scrapped but who will do it and which leader/s are ready to face the ensuing aftermath of such a move ?

2006-12-20 23:42:59 · answer #2 · answered by funnysam2006 5 · 0 0

What about minorities residing in different states of India like slaves or bonded labourers, why ? If India has extra Muslims than Pakistan or Bangladesh, why do those international locations have extra Muslim engineers, medical doctors & different experts than India, actual > 25 circumstances & lots of them migrate to England, u . s . a . & Canada too many-many circumstances more beneficial than Indian Muslims overseas ? Pakistan, having inhabitants decrease than UP of India has one hundred fifty 5 universities & UP has basically 24, why ? UP has basically one inventory change & Pakistan has 5, why ? Are Indian human beings more beneficial off ? ninety % Indian village houses do not have loos & finished u . s . has thousands of thousands of beggars, no Islamic u . s . has the same even in minute quantity. India has basically 30 riches like Ambanis & human beings in sub human circumstances. Kashmir should be loose from inhuman clutches of India. Buddhists of Ladakh are basically < a million lakh. they ought to migrate to Gurdaspur, the district replaced into first given to Pakistan yet b coz of unknown causes, removed from Pakistan's map & positioned with India, with the help of Radcliffe. The 20 lakh inhabitants of Jammu ought to migrate to different Indian states everywhere Muslims of India massacred in seventy 5,000 communal riots from 1947 until eventually as we talk killing 70 lakh, specially in Punjab(Patiala, Faridkot , Nabha, Amritsar, Kapurthala), Haryana(Ambala, Hissar), Bihar(Bhagalpur, Biharsharif, Jamshedpur, Gaya & Rohtas) & finished Gujarat. that is really person-friendly.

2016-11-30 23:48:07 · answer #3 · answered by anuj 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers