2006-12-19 13:03:23 · 5 answers · asked by The Prince 4 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I'm not even sure who qualifies as a Neo-Freudian. Maybe I need to look it up...okay I did: Alfred Adler, Erik Erikson, Karen Horney, Erich Fromm, Carl Jung, Harry Stack Sullivan, and Clara Thompson were listed as Neo-Freudians at Wikipedia. I might guess that the idea of the Oedipal Complex was rejected by all Neo-Freudians but further reading would be necessary. Good question...
2006-12-19 13:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by TruBlevr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are too sexual, and the stages of (oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genitals) may not be in proper order or something like that. Also, most of them think hes idea of children becoming sexually attracted to their oppsite sex care taker and envious of the other is wrong. Thats just weird.
2006-12-19 21:48:38 · answer #2 · answered by Britterrsssss 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to name a few:
- focus on sexuality
- what could be suggested as mysogynistic ideals (penis envy, etc)
- focus on "abnormal" behavior , the individuals he documented were not indicative of what would necessarily be considered the "average" individual
2006-12-20 23:31:54 · answer #3 · answered by not amused 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that all behavior came from the drive of anger and sex
2006-12-19 21:14:41 · answer #4 · answered by baylor88 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think most of them felt that "penis envy" was not valid.
2006-12-19 21:11:04 · answer #5 · answered by K. D. M. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋