English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-19 10:56:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Holidays Christmas

13 answers

The first one, funnier and so much better than the second one.

2006-12-19 12:05:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The first is much better. The second is the same story line, but set in a Thai prison!!

2006-12-19 19:33:19 · answer #2 · answered by chelle0980 6 · 0 0

I've only seen the first one, but I always prefer the books to movies. Though Renee Zellweger was great. And Colin Firth is yummy!

2006-12-19 11:12:40 · answer #3 · answered by La 7 · 0 0

I wasn't too keen on either,they weren't a patch on the books.But the first was definately better than the second

2006-12-19 11:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by Lou 3 · 0 0

First was better. Those are some of the best books I have read too. Made me cry I laughed so hard!

2006-12-19 14:46:10 · answer #5 · answered by Yahoogirl 5 · 0 0

A doer - thinkers upward thrust up with too many surprising strategies and don't some thing. a minimum of i will tell my doer what to do and it gets executed! A fact seeker would desire to think of of roughly me telling him what to do and it could by ability of no ability get executed. flow away the thinking to the ladies people!

2016-12-11 12:29:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes the first one was better, like most prequels I guess!

2006-12-19 21:07:36 · answer #7 · answered by Drop a heart, break a name 3 · 0 0

Both films were utter s h i t.

2006-12-19 11:11:05 · answer #8 · answered by BIG ROUND HAIRY ONES 1 · 0 0

yeah first one was the best

2006-12-19 10:58:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You're not going to bother resolving this, are you?

2006-12-19 11:06:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers