2006-12-19 09:53:19 · 11 answers · asked by wrowx 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
No evidence of that. About the father, the best way to approach his acquittal is to consider what the jury saw. They heard the Fuhrman tapes where he made highly derogatory statements about blacks then lied underoath. The lead investigator in charge of the whole case freely admitted in court that he took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it back into the crime scene, which is against police policy. The jury saw a video taken by paparazzi of OJ, Nicole, Denise and their parents talking in a nice peaceful manner right after attending OJ/Nicole's daughter's dance recital - and Denise even kissed and hugged OJ (all this was a few short hours before the crime). There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, car or house consistent with someone who had done this crime in person. The jury saw that the glove truly did not fit - it was the wrong size (heat shrinks not moisture). The murder weapon was never connected to OJ or even found. There were no witnesses. OJ's slow speed drive at 30 mph to his own house is not indicative of guilt. The jury was taken to OJ's house and did not see a rumored large blood trail. The book "if i did it" deals with one chapter that is hypothetical and labeled fiction - a great part of the book likely is OJ defending himself against false allegations. Some may disagree with the jury verdict but it's unfair to state with absolute certainty that this person is guilty. OJ has always maintained his innocence.
2006-12-19 10:57:04 · answer #1 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's funny that you should ask that question. When this trial was going on I had a friend in Cali that had spoken of evidence or assumption that alot of people were talking that they suspected OJ's oldest son committing the crime. I always wandered if the police or detectives had made OJ's son place that one black glove on would it had fit his hand.My friend also mentioned that these people on whom he spoke with knew OJ's oldest son and also knew that he did not like Nicole at all whatsoever.So go figure... huh. If OJ didn't do it maybe his son did or better yet maybe it was both son and dad doing the crime.They had always said that it had to have been two people that did the crime not just one.I myself never heard of actual evidence against the son only hear say.
2006-12-19 14:18:21 · answer #2 · answered by shuggabhugga05 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you already know on the time of the trial, i constantly questioned relating to the son. He replaced right into a young person on the time. in case you notice the crime scene photos you will comprehend that the killer would have been sopping wet in blood and all they stumbled on replaced into some spots in the bronco and a few spots on socks in a pile of clothing in the abode. His son additionally would have had his dad's gloves as nicely. In anycase, that's maximum definate that OJ knows what got here approximately that evening and doesnt care and thinks each thing is humorous. the guy is unwell
2016-12-15 04:31:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
After the murder, OJ sneaked into his own house, as not to disturb Kato, the judge for Eye For Eye, who was sleeping in the house. He put the knife and everything in a luggage bag and went out of town. OJ was panicking. If he wasn't guilty, why did he have to act sneaky.
2006-12-19 11:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by yennay 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
OJ is guilty and there was plenty of evidence against him. Nothing on the son. He acted guilty (car chase) because he was and is.
2006-12-20 01:02:40 · answer #5 · answered by downtownJbrown 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Just a theory by people that think OJ is innocent, there is absolutely no evidence pointing to any other than Mr. Simpson.
2006-12-19 10:03:03 · answer #6 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
thats funny..but i did hear since oj's book was yanked he was in the process of writing another one entitled.."if i did it, why is my son saying he did it"
2006-12-19 12:46:48 · answer #7 · answered by INFINITE CONSCIOUSNESS 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dude, seriously, OJ didnt do it,buit he absolutly knew about it and walked in on it too early..im so serious... he knew it was going down, wheteher or not he hired someone is not for me to say, but he himself did not do it, but he absolutly knew it was going down at the time, he just walked in on it too early... the killer wasnt quite done... no kidding, im serious.
2006-12-19 10:09:00 · answer #8 · answered by s p 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not heard of that
2006-12-19 11:29:53 · answer #9 · answered by Eyebee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
never heard that before
2006-12-19 09:58:23 · answer #10 · answered by great one 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋