Can people who think 9/11 wasnt an inside job bring some evidence?

Question

Their answer to everything is the two plans hit it. the twin towers were desighned to stay standing if a plane bigger than that crashed into it. The twin towers are built in 3 sections the plane hit the top so if the damage was bad the top would have fell leaving the rest standing. For those who will now answer saying it was the fire the pizza plaza burned for 17 hours and stayed standing and the twin towers a more modern and more fire resistant building burned for 45 minutes. The twin towers fell straight down in 10 seconds so all the support beams plus the 3 sections all broke at the same time. For those saying the generators like 3 or 4 genorators can bring down a section of the twin towers they must have thought of that and taken measures. The twin towers were insured against 'terroist attacks' a month before the attacks now people are going to answer it was a coincedence. The WTC are the worlds third largest gold deposits why did they remove all the gold hours before the attacks.

Answer 1

Right, lets get a few things straight shall we. It is the conspiracy fruit loops that should be proving their case and not the other way around.

You are the one who has made the outrageous claims that are without substantiation and the burden of proof is yours to carry. Just looking at your question it is appearent that you are leaving out details in order to make things seem more mysterious, the fire at the steel building in Europe that remained standing did not result from a plane crash and the building did not suffer any structural damage, as did the WTC, and it was not fed by jet fuel, which, despite the conspiracy claims to the otherwise, does burn hot enough to cause steel support beams to fail.
Other things you mention are simply not true, that the towers were only insured against a terrorist attack shortly before 9/11,,,they'd already been attacked once several years before and only a moron would suppose that there was no insurance in place in those intervening years.
The complete collapse of each of the towers was well over the ten seconds in length you claim and the reason for the time delay is because of the floors rapidly pancaking onto one another and the compression wave of air as this occured blew out windows which looked, to the uninformed, to be small explosives. Ten seconds isn't the correct figure and those who use it do so only to mislead people.

Leaving aside the small phantom army of technicians who would have had to spend weeks wiring the WTC for demolition, drilling into walls, cutting through support beams with torches and the like, I say phantom because nobody seems to have seen them and the place never really closed down (I used to work there and know) your theory just doesn't make sense and you have no evidence to back it up. Let's say that again just in event you missed it, YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE!!

I suppose the fact that you can't back up your claims, beyond explaining that you saw it on a video or read it on some web site, is why you want others to have to explain their positions and prove the negetive. One more time junior, you are the one who needs to back up your fantasy story. Carl Sagen once said that extraodinary claims require extraodinary proof. Thus far I haven't seen any proof, extraodinary or otherwise, from the conspiracy/inside job/tin foil hat wearing/still living in their folks basement/ side of the equation. You have proof??? Lets hear it junior and also where you came by the information. Otherwise shut up and stop annoying the grown ups.

Answer 2

you are an idiot, do your research,

that building sure did burn for 17 hours, it did NOT have a fully loaded full fuel 727 hit it at 400 mph.
they did NOT fall straight down, I WAS THERE the wreckage was everywhere,
common physics ( where else would the building fall? ) sideways, over like a tree? thats not possible, because the building isnt a solid structure like a tree, unless some other force pushed it over, it collapsed,
do I think we were spoon fed a rediculous media meal YES, there is a lot more to the story, but the planes brought down those towers,
the gold being removed was scheduled long before, and insurance payments are due every month,
I think there is a lot of cloudy stuff surrounding 9/11 the pentagon, flight 93

at least pick something that makes sence to question,

nobody thinks that fl93 was shot down into that field? or a missle hit the pentagon?

we saw live video of the towers getting plowed by jumbo's

Use your head man!

Answer 3

1) Someone saw crap falling off the side and said "They're collapsing", then they actually collapsed. 2) THe boiler 3) Osama Bin Laden was in afganistan on 9/11. His family was evacuated because they were threatened with death. I don't necessarily priase this move but it was not part of a conspiracy. 4) Bush blamed osama and then said that Saddam was complicit. He did not say that Osama didn't do it.

Answer 4

1. It's impossible to prove that something was NOT an inside job. You cannot prove a negative.

2. Do you have a valid source for any of the above info?

3. Have you pondered how many hundreds, perhaps thousands of decisions that had to go exactly right for an "inside job" to occur "properly"?

4. Conversely, have you pondered how many more ways an "inside job" would have gone completely wrong?

5. Please read Popular Mechanics' article and book on these issues. They provide engineering, construction, and other evidence that debunks the "Loose Change" nonsense theories that exist.

Answer 5

The towers did not have protection against fire at that temperature, and Osama said he did it.
By the way the Empire state building would not have fell because it was built of steel and concrete, not tubes.

Answer 6

Popular Mechanics already debunked the 9/11 myths. It's called a conspiracy theory for a reason. BTW do you still believe Elvis is alive? Check my source and prove that stuff wrong.

Answer 7

I opt for the fact they had been blowing up our ships and other things that was ours overseas during the Clinton years prior to this attack. None of them with the guns were american citizens..
Remember 9/11!!!

Answer 8

After this, I'd like you to explain to me why the unsinkable ship was sunken by an iceberg. Man cannot determine the physical laws of this world accurately. Listen to your common sense and stop trying to enforce figures that are likely to be false.

Answer 9

www.popularmechanics.com Search for the story entitled "9/11: Debunking the Conspiracy Myths."
www.youtube.com Search for the series of films "Screw Loose Change." (They can also be found on Google)
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/...
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://underground.soulawakenings.com/ti...
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_...
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1348..........
http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/05/l...

Answer 10

Your on crack son. Osamas family is in the construction business. He knew exactly what it would take to have a potential collapse. Luck + knowledge = sucky day.