post a question. some of the questions are down right stupid. and some idiots join for a day post drivel and ask antagonistic questions.what do you think, do you care, or do you get to a point when this becomes a bore so you have to resort to these tactics ?
2006-12-19 08:51:04 · 33 answers · asked by ? 5 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
L.F.and again without to much detail you hit the nail on the head, WHAT A COMPLETE PLONKER.
2006-12-19 08:59:39 · update #1
Don't you think you are being a little bit anal and precious about all this pal? People like Pat the Proddie are just vile but it restores my faith in human nature how few people are backing him up!
I mean, who decides what is sensible? And, imagine you have a really burning question to ask about Wayne Rooney's acne treatment, or how your boyfriend slept with your mothers, brothers, girlfriends dog? And you have to answer 20 sensible questions before you can get to ask! The kids'd go crazy I tell you!
And what would, Me. Anne, Bikerbear, Fudgie et al do on a Sat night instead of gettin pished in front of our PC's askin rubbish? We may actually have to go out and mix with the real folks!!
Sorry Giggles me old chum, your talkin pants. So chill out, have a mince Pie and a glass of mulled wine and tell me all about your bad day!! x
2006-12-19 11:23:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, that would not solve anything. Ignore the antagonists; under your restrictions, they would just be posting antagonistic answers. Besides, Yahoo gives people 100 points when they start just so that they can ask questions... lots of people join just to ask a question or two, and the system lets them do that. If they could not ask questions without first trying to answer a bunch of questions, a lot of the questions would never be asked.
Or look at it this way: Most of the regulars are fairly intelligent and mostly answer questions. The people doing most of the asking are the ones needing info for a report or homework solutions, etc., and they do not answer many questions.
2006-12-19 09:02:39 · answer #2 · answered by computerguy103 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You'v got a good point - I think 50 questions is a bit too many though. How about making it 20. But how would it be policed/ monitored?
I also think some people just like to communicate drivel or just insult as many people as they can
2006-12-19 08:54:10 · answer #3 · answered by Star 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly the element is, is that if Yahoo is going banning debts by skill of the impression of Darth Maul, they could't danger the off threat of creating pretend judgment. (the position what they're going to do ninety% of the time, is make NO judgment) the way issues are carried out right it is by technique of conventional vote. once you record someone, that isn't do some thing till you've some different human beings reporting the same individual for the same reason. in truth, that folk who opt for to farm "answer factors" (which i am going to't imagine how someone ought to probable discover excitement in doing) can't be delt with till stuck pink exceeded. because it truly isn't any longer feasible to be able to observe their each and every flow, you're merely going to could get human beings to be doing the same element as you're. yet what i imagine is this. in case you'll get a dozen human beings to get somone banned, what's the point. they're going to both commence a sparkling account, or others a twin of him will come round. it truly is unnecessary, so merely flow on and keep being a excellent contributor. Trolls will be trolls, unhappy lonely those with out lives. go away them be.
2016-11-27 20:36:51 · answer #4 · answered by axtell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually think thats a good idea - why not put it to Yahoo and see what they say. Lately there have been more and more people constantly getting barred and then signing back up again and posting more stupid or racist questions straight away - maybe this is the way to avoid that happening so much xxxxxxxxx
2006-12-19 08:54:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I suppose, I've only been here a short while and I've asked no questions, I enjoy answering questions. But yes your right, there are idiots that ask stupid questions. But on the otherhand there are geunine people wanting a quick answer to something.
2006-12-19 09:01:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Happy Christmas
2006-12-19 09:05:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe not answer that many questions but have a certain score - so you could either answer lots of questions or answer a few and be the best answer
2006-12-19 12:41:22 · answer #8 · answered by cric_tatz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I half agree with you, Maybe 20 sensible answers per question.
2006-12-19 08:54:01 · answer #9 · answered by Because I Said So 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just ignore those dumb questions, then they will waste 5 points and won't be able to choose a best answer either.
2006-12-20 02:19:13 · answer #10 · answered by cloud 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋