Take a look at this guy...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoJBWQ1vXkq5qVr6cSrYjEPzy6IX?qid=20061219124215AAlB4jn
How can anyone logically deduce that we are about to attack Iran given then geo-political situation.
Obvious Reasons why we are not going to attack Iran anytime soon:
Iran poses no immediate threat
Political situation in Iran right now suggests regime change in the near future.
It would be international political suicide.
Today's world requires at least a 3 or 4 month discussion in the UN prior to invading.
Some people might just need to put down that peace pipe.
2006-12-19 08:06:51 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The reasons you are giving for not attacking Iran right now are the same ones Dems have been giving for months.
2006-12-19 08:11:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
although I do agree that we probably won't be going into Iran anytime soon, and I agree with a few of your reasons... I don't agree with all of them... Iraq has been pretty close to international political suicide.. proving that Bush is less worried about what the international community thinks as compared to what he thinks is right and If we weren't tied down and didn't already have so much heat on us it wouldn't surprise me to see Bush skirt the UN to invade anyone... one thing is for sure.. if Bush did attack Iran, it would start WW III ... and (other than Iran) no one wants that.
2006-12-19 08:17:48 · answer #2 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, if you read that guy's posts, you'll see that he's not a liberal; HE'S A CONSERVATIVE. Oops.
And, wait...
Iraq posed no immediate threat (certainly not to the U.S. -- it was debatable whether we believed they posed an imminent threat to Israel)
There's no regime change in Iran's future -- the pres is doing great. But he IS showing signs of trying to think about being responsible in the International community. Saddam was (sort of) the same (except to his own people).
War with Iraq was international poltiical suicide, causing deep divisions among Western nations and LESS security for Americans.
2006-12-19 08:11:12 · answer #3 · answered by Perdendosi 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i don't think being a liberal doesn't have anything to do with it, hes just paranoid.
We all just have to wait for the holidays to come to an end, so Bush can reveal his new policy, who knows those 30,000+ troops they are planning to send to Iraq, might be transferred to Iran?, I mean we initially started in Afghanistan and now a days we rarely ever hear about that place at all on the news.
2006-12-19 08:12:28 · answer #4 · answered by Arpan G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
are you 12?
2006-12-19 08:17:40 · answer #5 · answered by noestoli 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtbcmA90ZAmEibif3Zrtdh7zy6IX?qid=20061219125436AAcLSFV
So why does this fine young REPUBLICAN support and list reasons for invading Iran????
2006-12-19 08:13:59 · answer #6 · answered by Snarky 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You'd think they'd be happy with the last election results, but they're STILL running for cover from any real conflict in the world.
Maybe their stem cell research could grow them a backbone!
2006-12-19 08:15:13 · answer #7 · answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
"Iran poses no immediate threat"
Please substitute the word Iraq in there.
I'm not agreeing that we're about to invade Iran; I'm just pissed about Iraq.
2006-12-19 08:11:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why are there so many paranoid wack-job Conservatives on here?
Each side has their nutjobs. If I had to pick though, it would seem most of them exist on the right...
2006-12-19 08:09:57 · answer #9 · answered by Amanda S 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You left out the fact that no one has ever successfully invaded Iran/Persia. That guy is a loony.
2006-12-19 08:09:26 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋