The Iraqi Freedom Fighters.
2006-12-19 06:40:12 · 10 answers · asked by KOISHCHEN 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To the Iraqis, yes they are. Why would we call them freedom fighers when their targets are our own?
2006-12-19 07:14:51 · answer #1 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
via fact the terrorist warring parties are stepping into the rustic from different countries jointly with Syria, Iran and Afghanistan. people who could combat against (or for) a central authority of a rustic they are from would not be insurgents. the U. S. and GB are sacrificing a great deal to hold democracy to a rustic that has been, for too long, under the thumb of a persevering with, genocidal dictator. the only element that Islamofascists comprehend is stress and, brother, they are seeing lots of it. right here is hoping for their decimation.
2016-12-15 04:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats the old one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter .
Violence only leads to more violence .Seeing as how most of the violence is against the people of Iraq it is the Military forces job to restore peace to a nation which for years has been torn apart by violence .Saddam maintained control by jailing and killing those who opposed his regime and now that he is gone the new leadership must restore security and peace to the nation before it can leave .
I submit that a radio address and campaign be launched to end the violence and attacks in Iraq and The military presence will leave in short order . A month without violence would see America and Britain forced to remove troops .and return control of Iraq to its elected leaders .Once America can safely withdraw the troops it will .Solidarity among Sunni And Shiite at joint peaceful demonstrations would force America out .
We know you can not do this so we will stay and control the oil which is what Bush and a small percentage of Americans want . In the long run if you would end the violence we would be forced to leave . Unite in peace and your problem with America is over . Continue to fight among your selfs and we will remain and you will never be free of our military presences .
Let the people in America see your resolve for peace .Declare A month of peace at which time you expect America to start pulling out . You must bring this to the attention of the world media .
Begin by declaring peace among your selfs and soon America will be forced to leave .Continue to fight and it will never end .
2006-12-19 06:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are called what they are: Insurgents. Iraq has a democratically elected govt.
2006-12-19 07:28:44 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Insurgents don't seem to be killing soldiers as much as they are killing each other....
Your tone seems to me that you might actually be using possitive connitations to the people that are creating the very thing you're probably protesting: violence. If you want violence to stop in Iraq you should be opposed to these groups of people that start the hostilities.
On top of that, since I believe you actually meant that the they are fighting for "freedom from US oppression" then by using said possitive connitation you sir are a traitor to every soldier on the ground.
2006-12-19 06:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
That must be why they are killing there Police, members of their own government, muslims of different faith, wll you know i could just go on and on. The point is they don't care who the kill. That is some kind of freedom.
2006-12-19 06:45:55 · answer #6 · answered by here and now 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Because they murder innocent Iraqis.
2006-12-19 06:42:34 · answer #7 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
They are not freedom anything
Nazislamic Fascist is what they are
and apologist and supporters are mentally deranged hate mongers
traders to Our country
take it in the @s s punks
2006-12-19 06:44:18 · answer #8 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
more like power fighters. they are fighting for their specific group within Iraq to get power.
2006-12-19 06:44:18 · answer #9 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
They would be...if they were aiming their attacks on US troops rather than innocent civilians.
2006-12-19 06:42:17 · answer #10 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋