Would you rather beat up a baby or a big wealthy man?
2006-12-19 06:25:59 · 11 answers · asked by Derek D 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
i protect the poor or people with nothing before i would ever in my life protect a wealthy person! wealthy people are as$ holes and wouldnt care for you if u are in need, a poor person would because they know how it is.
2006-12-19 06:28:46 · answer #1 · answered by ~*cRaCkNeSs*~ 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Here's an idea....how about we protect them both? Protecting the wealthy, and protecting the poor are not mutually exclusive. Once you come to accept that truth, it will change your life.
2006-12-19 14:29:40 · answer #2 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That makes absolutely no sense. You must be a teenager. However to answer your original question, those who have wealth will do what with the wealth? They will utilize it in the economy creating jobs, industry so on and so forth. Those who have nothing, will not provide us with anything, they will only take. I also saw the earlier question you asked, something about the government not giving you health care. The government is part of a inner structure, people should take care of themselves, not rely on the government to do everything for them.
2006-12-19 14:31:29 · answer #3 · answered by SO 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd have to go with protect those with nothing...the wealthy can take care of themselves and have the cash to hire or buy off anyone for the right price...those with nothing are usually backed against a wall with no means available to even take care of the basics sometimes...
2006-12-19 14:31:01 · answer #4 · answered by dustiiart 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Of course the poor need protecting over the rich..the rich have hords of money they can protect themselves with, the poor don't. And yes I would love to beat up Lee Scott (CEO of Walmart)
2006-12-19 14:28:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
How about everyone protect themselves? We have the right to keep and bear arms in this country. USE IT.
2006-12-19 14:37:59 · answer #6 · answered by cynicusprime 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The wealthy have the capacity to protect themselves. It is the downtrodden we must look after.
To answer your 2nd question - neither.
2006-12-19 14:33:45 · answer #7 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I protect myself from all. I got guns and lots of bullets. Big or small. they all would fall
2006-12-19 15:49:37 · answer #8 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this one of those "Catch 22" questions? It just sounds so "thuggish", to me!!! It IS more enjoyable to watch a rich person loose their wealth, but after awhile you just have to reconnect them with their money in order to shut them up about all their misery!!!
2006-12-19 14:36:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
What kind of a dumb@$$ question is that?
All humans, regardless of age, gender, income, or social status are equally deserving of basic human rights.
2006-12-19 14:28:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋