English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well, here are my reasons why I think he sucks.

1. He has sent troops out to fight a fictional war against Iraq, and he lies ALOT.

2. Didn't even win the popular vote, or electoral (Florida).

3. He is the only President to enter office with a criminal record (theft, drunk driving, disorderly conduct).

4. Sent troops to fight in over 10 countries while in office (only one which we are at war with).

5. Since this time last year, he has managed to lose 445 billion dollars.

6. While in office, Bush has lost the country nearly 5 million jobs.

7. There are suspicions that he is the anti-christ (www.bushisantichrist.com).

8. He Doesn't have his own brain. His term and campaign are run completely by Cheney and Republicans!

9. 80% of his funds come from big corporations, who then make most of his decisions. (GM, Previously Enron)

10. Bush has found 0 weapons of mass destruction, but has spend billions of dollars on the "war" with Iraq, by the way where is Osama

2006-12-19 05:50:21 · 8 answers · asked by James A 1 in Politics & Government Government

Dumbass, Im asking for your reasons, I already stated mine.

2006-12-19 05:55:45 · update #1

8 answers

A HUGE disappointment. Right after 9/11, he seem to be a tough, serious, take no "bs" type of president truly concerned about the country. He went after Iraq and him and his cabinet lied about the weapons of mass destruction and created a worst mess in the Middle East. We should have done our job ONLY in Afghanistan, punish those who murders thousands of innocent people and left.

I am no longer a Republican. I have chosen to be an independent because 99.9% of politicians lie and just care about themselves so we have to vote for the "least corrupted" and the one with the best plan.

Unlike what the news wants us to believe by only covering the negative, there are good people in both parties and we should work together for the good of the country and THEN, the world.

2006-12-19 07:14:26 · answer #1 · answered by nowhere 3 · 1 1

I think he is a great President, but he has been slacking the last year or so. About your reasons...
1. Fictional war? I got shot at both trips over there. Nothing fictional about that. What has he lied about that you can PROVE?
2. No, he didn't get the popular vote. SUPREME COURT ruled that he got the electoral vote. Supreme Court is the highest authority in the land. What they say goes. So he DID get the electoral votes.
3. I'm not sure on the factuality of that statement, and I don't feel like looking it up. But I don't think he's the only one. Everyone makes mistakes when they're younger.
4. Nearly every President has sent troops to fight. And technically, we're not at "war" with anyone. There hasn't been a true declaration since WW2.
5. Lose $445B ? Most of that money has gone to the troops. I wouldn't call that lost.
6. Um, last I heard, the job rate and jobless claims are better now than when he got into office. The country lost jobs at first, kind of like the economy going into the dumps, but both have rebounded.
7. Whatever.
8. Whatever. Be serious.
9. Like he's the only President to receive funding from major corporations. EVERY President has.
10. Saddam was a weapon of mass destruction. I've seen mass graves with my own eyes. Oh, and YOU try and run a search effort for ONE person in an extremely mountainous region suck as Afghanistan and Pakistan. No? Can't do it? Then stop complaining!



--EDIT--
Good arguments Hemingway.

2006-12-19 06:06:53 · answer #2 · answered by T 3 · 3 2

N O ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Democrats have got to respect that given that the 73rd Congress in 1933, for a MAJORITY of THE LAST sixty five YEARS, Democratic Houses of Representatives and Democratic Senates have CONTROLLED the country and the President. A TOTAL of 38 Sessions with Democrats in CONTROL for 28 of the ones! WE have got to tell/TELL our political representatives that WE NEED TO PASS a Constitutional Amendment for the LINE ITEM VETO. This will hold the SPECIAL INTEREST GARBAGE from being hooked up to priceless laws. If Congress wishes to deliver the president that vigour, they are going to have got to go a constitutional modification, Supreme Justice John Paul Stevens stated. "If there may be to be a brand new process wherein the president will play another function in picking out the textual content of what would possibly end up a regulation, such difference have got to come no longer through laws however via the modification techniques set forth in Article V of the Constitution," Stevens stated, on June twenty fifth, 1998. IF your unique curiosity is SO priceless, why do you have got to HIDE it in priceless laws? So, with them REFUSING to PASS the Line Item Veto, really, the House and Senate have REALLY been controlling the nation!! AND, with the CURRENT Senate and Congress having the WORST approval ranking in HISTORY, expectantly we can see a LOT of alterations after the average elections. A up to date Reuters ballot is out and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have pulled an disenchanted: They have controlled to make George Walker Bush two times as fashionable as CONGRESS. RECENTLY - - JUST thirteen% of Likely Voters now say the DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED Congress is doing a well or exceptional task. A up to date Rasmussen Reports country wide cellphone survey determined that forty three% deliver Congress a deficient ranking. Those outcome constitute a mild diminish from the prior month, whilst 15% gave Congress a well or exceptional ranking. Democrats typically think in heavy fines for sincere paintings, at the same time lucrative sloth and indulgence. Do YOU suppose that men and women will have to be competent to do surely not anything effective and get executive hand-outs for sloth and indulgence - healthcare, tobacco, alcohol, medicinal drugs, STDs, and many others. ?? Do YOU wish to have YOUR MONEY TAKEN from YOU and YOUR FAMILY to FINANCE those men and women ??? .

2016-09-03 15:44:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

1)George Bush was not alone in the decision to go to war with Iraq- many top democrats, including John Kerry and Hillary Clinton supported the decision.

2)Gore lost the election- get over it. he even lost his home state.

3)that's interesting. a misdemeanor charge. but considering that George Washington owned slaves and Ulysses S Grant slaughtered hundreds of innocent Americans, it kind of pales in comparison.

4)Clinton launched more TONS of TNT in his term than Bush Sr did in Iraq Gulf War, and no one got their panties wadded.

5) Katrina, World Trade bombing, little things like that affect the economy- go figure. Bushes economy, considering all the country has been through, hasn't been bad at all.

6) 5 million jobs were lost to illegal immigrants during Bushes term, that is probably true.

7) Don't be silly. George Bush has more support from the Christian Right than any other president in history.

8)Bush ran the governorship in Texas quite well, proving his ability as a mediator and innovator. He may not be a genius, but he gets things done.

9)80%? That really isn't that much consider like 2% of the country makes 95% of the money.

10)They found TONS of conventional weapons in Iraq. If Saddam didn't have anything to hide, then why didn't he welcome UN inspectors? Look where he is now.

2006-12-19 06:08:56 · answer #4 · answered by Lane 4 · 2 2

Aside from the glaringly apparent incompetence, arrogance, abuse of power, blood-for-oil war, corruption, countless hypocrisies, stubbornness, deceit, and inarticulateness, perhaps because an esteemed group of professors from Harvard University named Bush the "Worst President in History".

So the answer to your question is a resounding "YES"!

P.S. Note to T: I truly admire and appreciate your loyalty and patriotism. However, Bush's lies are countless. He said he didn't know Jack Abramoff, yet several witnesses verified that he visited Bush at the Crawford Ranch numerous times. When Bush was trying to sell us on the idea of invading Iraq, he proclaimed that Saddam was part of the 9-11 attack. Years later, he claimed he never made that statement. He claimed that there was a relationship between Saddam and bin Laden. The truth is that they hated each other and were anything but allies. He claimed that no one could foresee that the levees would breach during the Katrina hurricane, yet in a recorded conversation with Michael Brown, the ex-FEMA director clearly warned him that the levees would not hold. Bush told us that it was illegal to wire tap without a court order, then ignored the law to fit his agenda. I could go on, T, but I think you get the point.

2006-12-19 06:08:21 · answer #5 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 1 2

Those 10 reasons are enough to have him remembered as being one of the worst presidents, and I thought Harding had that fame forever!

2006-12-19 06:43:00 · answer #6 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 1 0

You are not supposed to answer your own questions.

2006-12-19 05:55:04 · answer #7 · answered by Gustav 5 · 1 2

NO he is not

2006-12-19 05:53:32 · answer #8 · answered by SG 4 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers