Blacks and whites weren't even allowed to marry when they finally got rid of slavery. Everything just takes time. I think the real hold up os the fact that if the government allows gay marriage then taxes and all that get filed differently which they lose money on, all the rights that go along with being married (like life support) are putting more money into the pockets of the lawyers. So it's all just a big cycle that too many people are getting money from, so until it comes to an even bigger head than it is, it won't happen. But then again I'm paying for social security that won't be around when I'm old... I think this generation is the one that's going to have to reform the government because it is way too full of itself. There is no more "for the people" it's all just "for the money".
2006-12-19 05:48:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by IceyFlame 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, we were on a roll prior to the current administration. Its quite likely that a democrate will be elected this time, its rare that one party would hold the office for 12 years. That being said it may be viewed that Kerry's support of equal rights lost him the election and therefore dems may be less likely to voice their opinions and we may be dumped by the party we've been raising money to support. I doubt it will happen in ten years, progress is slow. I would say 15 - 20.
2006-12-19 06:37:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Just Jess 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are being denied social security benefits, health insurance coverage for spouse, inheritance benefits as well a marriage certificate. Is that what God wants for two people whose only mistake was to meet and fall in love? More and more states are beginning to question this, so I believe there is hope for our gay friends .
2006-12-19 06:32:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An older era antagonistic to homosexuality is loss of life off, leaving a youthful era that's plenty greater open to the assumption, and greater suited knowledgeable as to sexual orientation. jointly as i'm happy approximately that, and sense stable relating to the prospect of universal acceptance and criminal secure practices for comparable-intercourse relationships over the subsequent era, i think of awaiting such seismic substitute (gay marriage in all states) in purely ten years is a tad bit over-useful. increasing the criminal protections absolute to gay and lesbian human beings is something to proceed to artwork and combat for.
2016-10-18 12:03:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would set the more realistic time at 30-35 years. Things are slow to change, the law is largely reactionary, but things are changing faster than they did in the past.
2006-12-19 06:13:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by jenn_smithson 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think 10 years is too fast unless the Supreme Court says otherwise. I don't see that being terribly likely with the current court. It will happen thought because kids in school now say they care less and less about whether someone is gay.
2006-12-19 05:42:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Avalon 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Marriage is just a business, yeah it will be legal within ten years
2006-12-19 05:50:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by cabhite 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
10 years... yes, I'm very optimistic about it. And some other nations will start their own debate and follow suit!
Keep on the good fight!
2006-12-19 05:55:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One step at a time
One state at a time
If it takes civil unions first then so be it
but WE SHALL OVERCOME!
2006-12-19 06:16:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tegarst 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it will, though I really want it to. It is not fair to people who have different thoughts on things; who prefer different people. I really hope it will.
2006-12-19 05:45:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋