English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

What year do you live in anyway. This is the year 2006 and almost 2007. Read your history books to see what the populations WAS in the year 2000.

2006-12-19 05:24:36 · answer #1 · answered by Texan 6 · 0 0

you prefer your homework performed for you? I advise you seem up issues linked with overpopulation. it relatively is basically what the question is approximately. you are able to factor out themes with potential overuse, pollutants, famines and nutrition shortages, probable even the extra beneficial injury of organic mess ups. working example, east Texas is affected by a great develop in earthquakes this twelve months. the section has had extra earthquakes interior the previous twelve months than interior the previous thirty years. Why? properly, the present theory (meaning there is information in this path, even with the undeniable fact that that's no longer certainly shown because of the fact the reason) is that the fracking technique used to benefit get right of entry to to organic gas is a great deal changing the underground and this instability is inflicting the earthquakes. This technique is being performed because of the fact overpopulation is inflicting oil shortages, and so we are in seek of for different potential sources which could nonetheless shield the inhabitants length, and does not possibly be needed if inhabitants replaced into so great. yet additionally, the size of the inhabitants in east Texas has additionally extra beneficial city and city sizes interior the section, so whilst those earthquakes hit they do extra injury because of the fact there is extra there to be broken. it quite is one occasion, and in case you employ it it relatively is high quality, yet you do nonetheless could desire to rfile it so do your homework in this. however the question is looking approximately problems with overpopulation, so I advise you seem that up for extra information. For the checklist, the certainty is that overpopulation does not easily could desire to be a undertaking. there is adequate USABLE land on the planet for each and each individual residing or ineffective to have one acre of land apiece. that's basically that we do an extremely undesirable activity of source administration. it quite is exacerbated by utilising how we chop up ourselves into international locations. working example, China has approximately 4 situations the inhabitants of america, yet has a matching-sized landmass. So China is basically attempting to in good shape 4 situations as many people into an analogous section we've. So on an analogous time as there is adequate space on earth, there's no longer adequate space of their u . s ., for this reason the overpopulation undertaking.

2016-10-05 12:26:39 · answer #2 · answered by milak 4 · 0 0

how about you go to a government website and check to see what the population was back in 2000. that might make sense.

2006-12-19 05:18:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you could use A=Pe^rt but you don't have a rate at which this is growing. Sorry I don't have anything else for you but maybe you do have a rate that you are supposed to use. A=5.4e^(r(7))

2006-12-19 05:19:51 · answer #4 · answered by M&M 2 · 0 0

why would you want a projection for a fact that is known?
OR
get a time machine...

2006-12-19 05:22:42 · answer #5 · answered by techteach03 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers