Then a ceasefire could be called between warring factions, civil liberties could be restored, an interim government could be appointed and peacekeeping forces could be sent in? This might allow for aid to be restored and help prevent a civil war that could be damaging to Palestine, Israel, Jordan, Turkey, Greece, Syria and Lebanon.
I am not suggesting the U.S. go in since this is not about the U.S. in Palestine.
2006-12-19 04:52:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
they are already there. they allowed the palestines to ramp up their military bases, right under their noses, so they could throw more bombs and kidnap more of the israelis.
the UN is completely useless and corrupt.
2006-12-19 05:10:48 · answer #1 · answered by Buk (Fey) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? The U.N. peacekeeping forces are completely ineffectual everywhere they go. They are usually corrupt as well, which would not work well, in the palestinian territory which is totally rife with corruption from top to bottom.
The last thing the UN wants is to get in the middle of a terror war. They were in Iraq and bugged out as soon as a few UN staff got killed.
What you propose would be great if it could actually happen, but it is totally unrealistic, and bordering on fantasy.
2006-12-19 13:03:13 · answer #2 · answered by FrederickS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
Look at the history Even the ancient Egyptians wrote in Hieroglyphs that Gaza was a den of thieves. And uncontrollable.
Normally one would think that after 5000 years of conflict that the general public would move on to new locations and ideas as to who they need to involve themselves with. But no Gaza is still the fixation of the meddlers.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-19 13:04:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You might want to look for a place called Palestine in your atlas, or the World Almanac. There is only one place with that name and it is in Texas.
Until 1950, the name of the Jerusalem Post was THE PALESTINE POST; the journal of the Zionist Organization of America was NEW PALESTINE; Bank Leumi was the ANGLO-PALESTINE BANK; the Israel Electric Company was the PALESTINE ELECTRIC COMPANY; there was the PALESTINE FOUNDATION FUND and the PALESTINE PHILHARMONIC. All these were Jewish organizations. In America, Zionist youngsters sang "PALESTINE, MY PALESTINE", "PALESTINE SCOUT SONG" and "PALESTINE SPRING SONG." In general, the terms Palestine and Palestinian referred to the region of Palestine as it was. Thus, "Palestinian Jew" and "Palestinian Arab" are straightforward expressions. "Palestine Post" and "Palestine Philharmonic" refer to these bodies as they existed in a place then known as Palestine. The adoption of a Palestinian identity by the Arabs of Palestine is a recent phenomenon. Until the establishment of the State of Israel, and for another decade or so, the term Palestinian applied almost exclusively to the Jews.
2006-12-21 12:11:03 · answer #4 · answered by Mashtin Baqir 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be about time the UN get off their fourth point of contact. I actually think it would be important that the US not be a part of that group. If we went in, everything we did would be wrong to the palestinians. They would need countries that the locals would consider to be neutral, and the world is well aware that the US favors Israel.
2006-12-19 12:59:02 · answer #5 · answered by CAUTION:Truth may hurt! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen man, some of us were actually trying to help you understand......... the last time you asked this question .
The U.N. is an impotent, and corrupt organization !!!
2006-12-19 12:56:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The U.N. is a useless organization that should be disbanned
2006-12-19 13:13:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
as long as there's not oil there
and as long as its good for israel
and as long as there is no justice in this world and UN
they will not go
2006-12-19 15:30:43 · answer #8 · answered by Jordanian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋