I think they can if they wanted to....but, with situations present in the iraq and the middle east... i think their hands are full...
2006-12-19 04:51:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Miss. Me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, America cannot afford to attack another country. America can't financially afford it or politically. In my opinion, America should not have invaded Iraq (easy to say now). It's never fair to attack a country unless said country is truly a threat. Iraq was never a threat. And no matter how horrible Saddam was to his own people, his dictatorship helped to maintain stability in the region. Dictatorships such as those in Iraq, those that kept disparate religious groups united by brute force, must only be overthrown from within. That I think is the rule.
2006-12-19 04:52:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by john p 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you will find that the USA/ UK can and will attack any country it wishes.We may seem an easy target for the Easts fanatical under evolved religious freaks .But until the developing world realise that it is the most evolved that rule, not the ones that can breed the fastest ,there will always be lessons to be taught.
2006-12-19 05:10:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by gigabit 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Americans are good but the Government is not so. What ever US does in middle east is most unfair. The common men in US have shown their displeasure by defeating the present party in power.
But The American War Machine will not keep quiet for long. It is an industry which derive profit by wars and destruction.
2006-12-19 15:15:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brahmanyan 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
can't say.. america is targetinga country at one time and if it doesnot get the required products from a country then it will wage a war against that country by falsely implicating it as terrorist country.it is the same way in which it attacked afganistan and iraq
2006-12-19 05:25:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by NITIN H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
America shouldn't but almost certainly will attack Iran before long. No. it's not fair.
2006-12-19 05:31:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Katya-Zelen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
relatively, their assaults on us started lots in the past than that. maximum of it has to do with issues like how Richard Nixon backed putting Saddam Hussein in charge in Iraq, and how George H.W. Bush bought organic and organic and chemical weapons of mass destruction to Saddam Hussein. weapons he became on his own people. How George W. Bush made thousands of oil bargains with Osama bin encumbered, giving him the money mandatory to pay off the Taliban for take care of. money the Taliban used to extra crush the peoople of Afghanistan. there is likewise the reality that Jimmy Carter backed the Shah (former chief of Iran) as he replaced into tyrannizing his people. The Iranian Revolution overthrew that guy, and the recent leaders weren't happy with ways we had meddled of their united states of america. there is likewise how the united states replaced into area of the 5-united states of america team (usa, Britain, France, China, and the then-Soviet Union and now Russia) that forced out the Palestinians from their place of foundation and then shoved the Jews into that spot. it relatively is to no longer attack the Jews, ideas you. They weren't asked, the two. those 5 international locations basically took land from the Palestinians, and basically forced the Jews on it, and then went on their merry way and left the Jews and Palestinians to determine it out for themselves. Our united states of america has quite screwed with the middle East. there is greater, yet area is limited in this. regrettably, the terrorists are going after the incorrect people. they save hitting harmless people, somewhat of going after the government that did this to them. If people had often happening what our government replaced into doing to others, especially explosives practise for Osama bin encumbered (the CIA did that one) and weapons revenues to the Iraqis and Iranians on the comparable time they have been struggling with one yet another, we would possibly in no way have allowed it. yet what our government replaced into doing they lined up. And so we did no longer understand, and so we did no longer end them. people are super people; the comparable can't consistently be reported for our foreign places coverage.
2016-10-15 06:04:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its sooooooo not fair !!!! and they probably won't but they might threaten iran
Lets just hope 4 the best!!!!!
2006-12-23 03:43:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by shifteh f 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
irans next. fair? until the ref blows the whistle.
2006-12-19 07:16:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
USA can do whatever they want...nothing is fair in LOVE and WAR
2006-12-19 06:34:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋