English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The way I see it. . . . let him sell the book. . . then we can take all the profits and buy or build an interplanetary nuclear missle. We can then strap this cro magnon to it and shoot it into pluto!!!

2006-12-19 01:47:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

9 answers

Use it as evidence in a NEW TRIAL and CONVICT HIM.

2006-12-19 02:12:10 · answer #1 · answered by Clrinsight 3 · 0 1

As a person found "not guilty" OJ has freedom of speech rights and has done nothing to be censored. The chapter of "If I did it" is hypothetical and labeled fiction and a great part of the book is likely OJ defending himself against false allegations. The book should have been made available and people have a CHOICE whether to read it or not. One way to approach his acquittal is to consider some of what the jury saw. They heard the Fuhrman tapes where he made highly derogatory statements about blacks then lied underoath. The lead investigator in charge of the whole case freely admitted in court that he took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it back into the crime scene, which is against police policy. No murder weapon was ever found and there weren't any witnesses. The "found" glove didn't fit - wrong size (heat shrinks, moisture doesn't). The jury was intelligent enough to analysis the evidence. A slow speed drive at 30 mph to his own house is not indicative of guilt. Some may disagree with the jury verdict but it's unfair to state with absolute certainty that this person is guilty. Simpson has always maintained his innocence. Likely the "If i did it" title and chapter was decided by the publisher and network for the sensational value which they thought would translate into higher book sales and higher TV ratings for the interview.

2006-12-19 11:03:00 · answer #2 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 1 1

Yes. O.J. Simpson beat the system and now he is doing a public service by rubbing our noses in it. If Simpson creates enough outrage the system will change and the next murderer will fry as Simpson deserved.

2006-12-19 10:19:35 · answer #3 · answered by d/dx+d/dy+d/dz 6 · 0 1

At least Simpson denies murdering anyone, and he had already suffered from the murders he did or did not commit. I never heard Penis or Hitlery Clinton, or Mad Albright or anyone of their type expressing any sorrow for any Serb or "Gypsy" killed by NATO's bombs. And they are allowed to sell the books they write.

2006-12-19 11:30:12 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 2 0

I think he should be allowed to sell it (Your American Right), but i also think that if all of us feel the same way. then we have nothing to worry about because he'll just be ashammed because his book he "didn't " write anyway! "not that smart" will not sell but about, what 2 copies. (himself and the pub.)

2006-12-19 10:02:56 · answer #5 · answered by Melissa & Eric 1 · 0 1

Your theory is amusing but OJ should not get any sort of benefit from his horrible text (fame, money, or supportive *********).

2006-12-19 11:19:19 · answer #6 · answered by RoRo 3 · 1 1

it is up to the public if they want to make him richer then he already is. If no one buys the book then maybe he will think about what he did. ( But I doubt it)

2006-12-19 10:06:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

WRONG!!!!!!

The man was found not guilty in a court of law and should be left alone.

2006-12-19 09:55:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

i agree babe,...

2006-12-19 09:49:16 · answer #9 · answered by big bird 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers