There is no place for Irfan Pathan in the team purely as a batsman. Since the team composition was 6 batsman, 1 Wicket Keeper and 4 bowlers and as bowling performance of Irfan Pathan of late has not been satisfactory, they Zaheer Khan, Sreesant, V.R.V. Singh and Anil Kumble, whom the team management thought the best 4 bowlers. Hence Pathan was not selected in the p,layng 11.
2006-12-18 23:20:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
on an analogous time as the win interior the 1st attempt has helped to redeem the status of India after the disasterous overall performance interior the ODI sequence and created historical past for Indian Cricket, i think of it's going to be inquiring for too lots to repeat the win interior the relax 2 tests besides. One shouldn't forget approximately the undeniable fact that South Africa is on the instant No. 2 team interior the international and that they'll come back strongly to avenge the defeat interior the subsequent tests. Irrespective the above, India can nonetheless win the subsequent attempt in the event that they proceed to play with an analogous zeal and energy, which they confirmed interior the 1st attempt. If India manages to win the sequence in South Africa, the Indian team would be transforming into yet another historical past, which i'm hoping they'll do.
2016-10-05 12:11:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Pathan should have played instead of VRV.....coz he is much beeter batsman than VRV....but VRV set it up for India with the batting in 1st innings...IT paid off for India!!
2006-12-18 22:29:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by johny harlow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually, its all politics. but, sreesanth and vrv. singh also bowled well. we couldnt' have dropped zaheer as he was our best bowler in the practice match. i agree wid u, pathan should be taken in place of jaffer and should be sent to open the batting !!!
2006-12-18 22:18:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by get2rohan_365 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
he sucks so does sehwag but hes not out of the team partly politics
2006-12-19 07:14:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kapil T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he is not in form. He seems to have lost his confidence.but he will be back once he regains it.
2006-12-19 06:33:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
politics
2006-12-22 02:42:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by sundar k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they needed bowlers who could get wickets
2006-12-19 01:19:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Harmony Ginger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
he is not bowling well
2006-12-19 17:31:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋