Not as we know it. Taxes are just resources taken from someone to pay for services in the society as a whole.
Whether it is an income tax, property tax, head tax or even just using a national resource (like oil) and selling it overseas, it still takes wealth from some (or all) to pay for things needed by some
others (or all others). How else can we pay for fancy tanks and fighter jets?
If you want to be a part of the club (USA, Canada, UK etc) you gotta pay to be a member.
Peace
2006-12-19 15:29:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by zingis 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Government can't exist with out taxes, so the question comes down to can civilization exist without government. History tells us that only people who live in small groups don't form some sort of government to decide disputes and keep order. Only in the most broad definition, could you call people living in small groups a civilization.
2006-12-18 21:04:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by meg 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, civilization existed before taxes for several thousand years before taxes were instituted. A better question would be, could civilizations exist without modern government systems. Yes they could. Communities of people require no governments if people actually begin to think for themselves and regulate themselves.
2006-12-18 19:22:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thousands of years ago,civilization existed without taxes.
2006-12-19 18:02:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by free2fly 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Civilization could exist without government, taxes and all that other lie. Taxation is mafia style extortion, glorified. Pay us to protect you with laws and we'll let you think you pass them for everyone's good but really it's just a money scam and control scam. If we refuse to pay them, then the corrupted ones will be out of a job. then we can workon cooperation to help others.
2006-12-19 04:14:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by eg_ansel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
each u . s . will continually have its beliefs. There extremely are not any societies that under no circumstances had any non secular beliefs in any respect. Even atheism is a kind of conception equipment. human beings are bringing up communist international locations, yet does the actual incontrovertible truth that the state suppressed faith recommend that the human beings are not non secular? Communists, anyhow, basically chosen diverse gods. They worshiped on the modify of economics. The Russian church bounded decrease back at the same time as it replaced into not muzzled, and evangelical Christians are making large headway in China and Japan. Even the Asian international locations had Buddhism and Confucianism laced with older ancestor worship and shamanism to serve the purpose of a faith. human beings cite Europe as a mundane continent that's thriving, yet Europe's success is outfitted upon the backs of adult males and women those who had faith, and many the regulations now may be traced to non secular roots. faith provides you stability, morality and desire to a rustic's human beings. faith is in many circumstances abused, besides the indisputable fact that that is a efficient device that any useful u . s . will use.
2016-11-30 23:00:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True. There was no other way to pool resources together to develop the common property and institutions needed to sustain civilisation.
Consider that as a serf in Medieval times you would work for the King one day in six, which is the equivalent of 20% of your labours going to the government. Anybody here pays this much in tax these days?
2006-12-18 20:04:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mardy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, duh.
No tax, no roads. No tax, no a gazillion other things. How is civilization suppose to exist without daily necessities?
2006-12-18 19:22:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Diamond 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think people will build and meet other needs without the burden of tax.but that is just what I think not what I know, Q. has a model of a tax free system been made for reference?
2006-12-18 19:30:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Civilization might.
Government wouldn't. The voters want the government to wipe folks a r s e s for them, and that costs money.
2006-12-18 19:26:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋