As compare to his former excellence: Devdas, Kal ho na ho & etc
2006-12-18 18:47:14 · 14 answers · asked by glover 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Shahrukh is a typed hero. He is not an allrounder hero. Allrounder hero means one who can fit in all types of roles like Comedy, Emotions and have all shades of acting. But Shahrukh khan is known for only Romantic hits. He is not a comedy, although he tried it in Badshad but could not do well. Actaully producers know it very well making movies with Shahrukh is safe because no matter if his movies dont run in domestic market but his movies are hot cake in overseas markets.
2006-12-19 00:13:46 · answer #1 · answered by The Answering Machine 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whoever told you SRK is a good actor. He is an over-reactor! Good actors are like Aamir Khan, Big B and Abhishek Bacchan, Arshad Warsi, Salman Khan etc! SRK is not even in the same league!
To reply to those who think Abhishek is not a good actor. First of all despite his tag he didn't make it till Dhoom 1. Second his talent was recognised right in "Refuge"
It is a sad part that movies make or break a star! That goes for SRK whose almost all movies are a hit because the stereotype is common! Family & love! Infact in KANK Abhishek displays more depth of performance in acting over SRK and this is from the critics side! Infact Pretty & Abhi are only worth watching! (apart from Kiron Kher)
2006-12-18 18:54:51 · answer #2 · answered by indiangal 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
As actors reach the heights of their career, they tend to get tired with their daily routine. They love their job, but wish they could have a break from their heavy schedule. There is pressure from all sides. Actors have their own personal problems. They begin to have heath problems due to lack of sleep and so on. The stress they undergo reflects in their acting. That's why SRK is not doing well with his acting.
2006-12-18 19:21:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know why maybe the downfall of India's best are coming...sehwaag use to play so good but now his performance is in question....same thing with shahrukh....maybe bollywood needs a new actor whose "ekdum hatke"
2006-12-20 10:40:15 · answer #4 · answered by billu_bhai 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think that way?....I think he acted pretty well in don...though a bit dissapointing in KANK...but KANK he did more for his frnd than for himeself....you wait and watch chal de india! he is going to do very well in that.... And people who claim he is no a good actor...please let me know how has he been on top for nearly 15 yrs
2006-12-19 06:17:12 · answer #5 · answered by Syed Shahnawaz Ali 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Movies are going down in number, hes old(:D), abhishek bachan and hrithik roshan take the spotlight these days....
2006-12-18 23:20:40 · answer #6 · answered by Meghna Anil 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
omg!!! wot r u on about?????
SKR is a gr8 actor and all actors hav their down fall sumtimez! it was jst his turn! Acting vise he is the best after Amitabh Bachaan than Bollywood has seen!
2006-12-18 19:58:10 · answer #7 · answered by -x-vitu-x- 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why whats wrong?hes still in shape.he was superb in kank...ok his looks were not very pleasing,but he acted very well.and don.....wah!wah!kya style yar!but no one can beet big B!
note:no offense,but please dont compare srk with abhishek.abhishek is in the industry b coz of his dad and not for his acting.he cant act and dance for nuts!i wonder how they gave him the best supporting actor in the gifa awards.....
2006-12-18 21:38:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i guess because he doesnt know how to chose the right characters for himself now. he chooses wrong movies like the don
2006-12-19 10:33:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
some of films that he stay fit. he is doing always great.he does not give performance inalternatively.u think wrong.do'nt give him credits of lossers.he is not olone who is working.
2006-12-18 21:25:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋